|
|
|
#153 | |
|
มวยสากล
East Side VIP
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: @ferociousflea
Posts: 44,041
vCash: 75 |
Quote:
AlFrancis thanks again by the way Olivares punched Rose out and every champion for the next decade was Mexican (I think....Olivares,Castillo,Olivares,Herrera,Lara...where does it go then? Anyway eventually it's Herrera,Martinez,Zarate ain't it? There might be a non-Mexican no.1 in their somewhere. I get a bit lost when Herrera loses the title 'cause Lara seems a tad erratic (shame there's not more on him though) and Herrera gets 'beat' by Bus Station (certainly beat up) before Martinez finally turns the trick on him (shame that isn't out there, or Herrera's title defence over him Man if Macias and Becerra came just a little bit later
|
|
|
|
|
#154 | |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Granada, Spain.
Posts: 3,946
vCash: 1000 |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#155 | |
|
Can you hear this?
ESB Addict
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,219
vCash: 1000 |
Quote:
but in case anyone wondered what happened in the Peacock rematch: [Only registered and activated users can see links. ] [Only registered and activated users can see links. ] [Only registered and activated users can see links. ] |
|
|
|
|
#157 |
|
มวยสากล
East Side VIP
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: @ferociousflea
Posts: 44,041
vCash: 75 |
I've seen the one where Macias gets cut down by Peacock and it shows how talented even the B-fighters of that era, left by the side of the road by most historically, were and shows it wasn't as thin on the ground talent wise as it may seem looking at some unrecognisable Algerians, Thai's and what not that contended for the title and the fractured titles.
It was bloody good. And yes Al', a golden era for Mexican boxing IMO and part of the greater picture in the greatest era of bantamweight history. If you split it down the middle; Jofre to Rose/Olivares to Martinez there isn't much between 'em. Two P4P greats in the first era but as much depth in the latter. Taken as a whole it's one of the greatest spans for a division in boxing history. Ridiculous. |
|
|
|
#158 |
|
Fighting Zapata
East Side Guru
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 5,443
vCash: 500 |
I think the '40s was worse than the 50's at bantam, though i don't consider it a concrete opinion.Just not enough footage and i wouldn't consider them bad either.
|
|
|
|
#159 |
|
มวยสากล
East Side VIP
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: @ferociousflea
Posts: 44,041
vCash: 75 |
War fucked it up. Also you had a fair few top flys dividing their time between divisions too and Jackie Paterson ranked highly for years in both whilst not really turning in his best in either.
Ortiz was obviously fantastic though but I agree that He could've done with a Macias rather than a Dade. Yes, there's no fucking footage either. I've seen a few Patterson highlights, whatever there is of Ortiz and that's about it. David Kui Young or whatever his name was, there's an Oriental I wanna' see, what ya' know about him? |
|
|
|
#161 | |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Granada, Spain.
Posts: 3,946
vCash: 1000 |
Quote:
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|