|
|
|
#1 |
|
P4P Number 1 Poster
ESB Addict
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 4,875
vCash: 272 |
I know that trout beat cotto. But I personally don't like the trout Alvarez fight.
I think cotto Alvarez would have made a more entertaining fight, better style match up. Trout reminds me of mora. The ability to make fights boring. Does preferring cotto Alvarez make me a casual fan, or do people agree it would be a more entertaining fight |
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
EastSide Boss
East Side Guru
Join Date: May 2012
Location: in a parallel universe
Posts: 5,335
vCash: 466602 |
so Cotto should get yet another title shot after losing 2 fights in a row??who do you think he is...Shane Mosley?
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
ESB Junkie
East Side VIP
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 37,627
vCash: 1000 |
Cotto would try, he would fight hard, but get knocked out. It's time for Cotto to retire........................Alvarez would have knocked Cotto out, worst than Pac did........................Trout will box and run, so it will be fun to watch Alvarez cut the ring off, or to see how he does it. I think he hurts Trout with body punches....................
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
P4P King
East Side VIP
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Battery Park
Posts: 15,213
vCash: 1080 |
Cotto-Canelo is a much more exciting fight than Canelo-Trout.trout is boring and a spoiler.Watching him is like watching grass grow.
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
P4P King
East Side VIP
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 27,388
vCash: 372 |
I will always prefer fights that make sense over brainless fights that are exciting and nothing else. The Trout fight further advances BOTH fighters into a better future. The paydays and carefully selected exciting fights come after a fighter is fully established.
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
"Al Grito De Guerra"
East Side VIP
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Oxnard, CA
Posts: 25,989
vCash: 0 |
I have no doubt that we will see this fight sooner than later...
Tho I'd settle for Angulo/Cotto as an undercard in Sept. |
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|