|
|
|
#16 | |
|
Diamond Dog
East Side VIP
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 63,251
vCash: 1000 |
Quote:
I think you underate the Terrell win in general. Though Ali never looks like using, he was at his absolute peak for that fight. Put any of those guys in with him on that evening and they would have dipped on this list, no? Patterson below Quarry? |
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
March 8th, 1971
East Side VIP
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Holland
Posts: 11,749
vCash: 238 |
I'm suprised by how low many people think of Young.
He has a win over Foreman who is top3 on these lists, he made a very close fight with Ali (should've won), should've gotten the nod over Shavers, beat Lyle who also makes it on some lists here and should've gotten the decision over Norton who also ranks high on most lists here. |
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Champion
East Side Guru
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: New York
Posts: 8,178
vCash: 1000 |
Quote:
I thought Young should be higher but I counted him as beating Ali, I thought we were rated Ali's wins based on how impressive, Young was up there with Frazier and Foreman, maby #2 but the win Ali had over him rates low(because I count it as a loss for Ali or a poor win |
|
|
|
|
#19 | |||
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
vCash: |
Quote:
Dropping him completely (as you did) would perhaps be wiser. Quote:
Ernie Terrell never impressed me. He's okay, but not better than the men I put ahead of him. Quote:
Especially considering Patterson's injury in the 1st fight, and his age in the 2nd. |
|||
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Peaceful Muslim Warrior
ESB Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Manchester England
Posts: 562
vCash: 1000 |
1. Liston I- Ali made him look bad, he would have beaten everyone else on this list.
2. Foreman - Crude but menacingly powerful and undefeated. 3. Frazier 2 and 3 (more so 3)- A true warrior gave Ali hell on all 3 occasions 5. Patterson II- Extremely skilled and lightining fast. 6. Norton 2 and 3- The bogeyman 7. Bonavena - Tough motherfucking son of a bitch. (pardon my french) 9. Foster - Excellent jabber, I know he wasn't a real heavyweight 10. Quarry II- Tough guy. |
|
|
|
#21 | |
|
Master Jabber
East Side VIP
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 11,925
vCash: 1000 |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#22 | |
|
Journeyman
ESB Jr Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 120
vCash: 1000 |
Quote:
Just 1 question.... why did you put norton of 1976 when ali beat norton much clearer in 1973... a better version of norton at that ?
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
March 8th, 1971
East Side VIP
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Holland
Posts: 11,749
vCash: 238 |
Norton started boxing late and had little amature experience, picked it up in the Marines i think. In 1976, he was somewhat greater because he had a nice winning streak (including Quarry) and a lot of experience whereas in 1973, an out of shape Ali was his only win worth noting.
I ignored the fact that he probably should've lost the third fight with Ali, though. I just looked at who was best at the time Ali beat him, whether it was close, rightful or not. |
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|