Boxing  

Forum Home Boxing Forum European British Classic Aussie MMA Training
Go Back   Boxing News 24 Forum > Boxing > General Boxing Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 09-17-2007, 08:23 PM   #1
liljp361
Belt holder
ESB Addict
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,653
vCash: 1000
Default Nate Campbell.

How good is a prime Nate Campbell????
liljp361 is online now  Top
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 09-17-2007, 08:31 PM   #2
NOLO
newbie
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 10
vCash: 1000
Default Re: Nate Campbell.

very dangerous and very hungry fighter. Gave a prime El Cepillo a tough fight and gave Kid Diamond a beating and a lesson about what its like to step in with a top tier fighter. Wouldn't count him out against any current and 'legit' lightweight.

Last edited by scorpy; 06-21-2006 at 12:41 PM.
NOLO is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2007, 10:20 PM   #3
Pimp C
I Ain't Got No Worries
East Side VIP
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 33,534
vCash: 138
Default Re: Nate Campbell.

I wold favor Campbell over anyone at 135 except Casa. A prime Campbell is a kinda of hard one because IMO even though he's not at his physical prime in age his boxing has never been better even at his current age.
Pimp C is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2007, 10:26 PM   #4
brooklyn1550
Roberto Duran
East Side VIP
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Michigan
Posts: 12,024
vCash: 1000
Default Re: Nate Campbell.

Very good lightweight at the moment...could give anybody hell
brooklyn1550 is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2007, 10:27 PM   #5
Amsterdam
Boris Christoff
East Side Guru
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 9,239
vCash: 1000
Default Re: Nate Campbell.

Quote:
Originally Posted by brooklyn1550
Very good lightweight at the moment...could give anybody hell
At his best, I'd pick him confidently over anyone at LW. Nobody tends to agree with me however.
Amsterdam is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2007, 10:35 PM   #6
brooklyn1550
Roberto Duran
East Side VIP
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Michigan
Posts: 12,024
vCash: 1000
Default Re: Nate Campbell.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Amsterdam
At his best, I'd pick him confidently over anyone at LW. Nobody tends to agree with me however.
At his best, nobody would be a sure thing over Nate. I'd like to see him and Katsidis go at it.
brooklyn1550 is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2007, 10:36 PM   #7
Amsterdam
Boris Christoff
East Side Guru
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 9,239
vCash: 1000
Default Re: Nate Campbell.

Quote:
Originally Posted by brooklyn1550
At his best, nobody would be a sure thing over Nate. I'd like to see him and Katsidis go at it.
Katsidis seems to cut too easily, that last B- level guy gave him hell. Nate would probably end him before the 5th.
Amsterdam is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2007, 10:44 PM   #8
jackiebrown
Journeyman
ESB Jr Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 249
vCash: 1000
Default Re: Nate Campbell.

he sure messed up putting his hands down agianst robbie
jackiebrown is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2007, 10:45 PM   #9
Amsterdam
Boris Christoff
East Side Guru
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 9,239
vCash: 1000
Default Re: Nate Campbell.

Quote:
Originally Posted by El Rey
He gave a more prime Casmayor all he could handle so given Joel's age and inactivity I'd pick Campbell to win right now. Though I'd still pick the two Diaz's, Julio and Juan to beat him.
Why?

Julio doesn't react well to pressure and Nate has KO power. J. Diaz doesn't so Julio vs. Juan will be a good fight potentially.

Juan will have issue's with Nate's speed and body work and I think Nate will back him up and beat him on the inside. Juan Diaz is overrated to an immense degree at the moment. Campbell's chin is not rock solid, but he can handle Juan and Julio's shots.

Last edited by MIK1000; 06-21-2006 at 04:08 PM.
Amsterdam is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2007, 10:48 PM   #10
tays001
ESB ELITE SQUAD
East Side Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PITTSBURG CA
Posts: 7,506
vCash: 75
Default Re: Nate Campbell.

Quote:
Originally Posted by brooklyn1550
At his best, nobody would be a sure thing over Nate. I'd like to see him and Katsidis go at it.
now that what you call fireworks i would much rather see that fight then a marquez -jaurez
tays001 is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2007, 11:40 PM   #11
liljp361
Belt holder
ESB Addict
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,653
vCash: 1000
Default Re: Nate Campbell.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Amsterdam
Why?

Julio doesn't react well to pressure and Nate has KO power. J. Diaz doesn't so Julio vs. Juan will be a good fight potentially.

Juan will have issue's with Nate's speed and body work and I think Nate will back him up and beat him on the inside. Juan Diaz is overrated to an immense degree at the moment. Campbell's chin is not rock solid, but he can handle Juan and Julio's shots.
I disagree...I think Juan Diaz is improving fight after fight...that includes his power...I was very impressed when he fought Freitas...and I think Diaz definitley seems like a tough young man in there...
liljp361 is online now  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2007, 03:09 PM   #12
andyZOR
Champion
East Side Guru
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Buffalo NY
Posts: 8,542
vCash: 823
Default Re: Nate Campbell.

Verry good fighter imo. He outclassed my boy Matt Zegan.
andyZOR is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Reply

Boxing News 24 Forum > Boxing > General Boxing Forum

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump





All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Boxing News 24 Forum 2013