Boxing  

Forum Home Boxing Forum European British Classic Aussie MMA Training
Go Back   Boxing News 24 Forum > Boxing > Classic Boxing Forum


View Poll Results: WHO WINS
MARCIANO 56 51.85%
DEMPSEY 49 45.37%
DRAW 3 2.78%
Voters: 108. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 09-23-2009, 11:39 AM   #76
Dempsey1238
Champion
East Side Guru
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 5,015
vCash: 1000
Default Re: Macriano Vs Dempsey

Quote:
Originally Posted by Duodenum View Post
Okay Maxmomer, this one's for you.

I've studied the movie films of both Marciano and Dempsey, frame by frame, as well as extensive newspaper accounts. I've read "Championship Fighting:Explosive Punching and Aggressive Defense" by Dempsey, and also have "Rocky Marciano's Book of Boxing and Bodybuilding" by Marciano and Charlie Goldman. I've read Dempsey's autobiography, as well as the Marciano biography by Everett Skehan. I have Nat Fleischer's autobiography, "50 Years at Ringside," as well as the Fleischer's 1957 edition of, "The Ring Record Book and Boxing Encyclopedia," and numerous newspaper clippings about boxing events going back to the late 1800's.

At Jack Dempsey's draft evasion trial in 1920, legally binding testimony was given and accepted under oath that Dempsey's camp accepted $500.00 to throw his first meeting with Jim Flynn, so that was a staged performance with a pre-planned outcome, not a competitive boxing contest. That is a matter of public record, and Nat Fleischer set a very bad precedent in 1922 by including this "affair" (as Dempsey termed it during his trial) in the "official" records of both Flynn and Dempsey.

There is footage of only one showing of a peak Dempsey, his title winning effort against Willard. Nat Fleischer was already a skilled veteran ringside observer of boxing (and in fact performed as a broadcaster, referee and judge during his career, in addition to functioning as Max Schmeling's manager of record for a time), and of course was at ringside for all Dempsey's major fights, as well as those of Louis, Marciano, Ali during his peak, and most other major bouts during his career. Fleischer stated that Dempsey's handspeed in Toledo was actually slightly superior to that of Joe Louis against Max Baer (the peak physical performance of the Bomber's career according to Louis himself, the outing when he was at his fastest and most mobile), and event of which Louis said he, "felt as though I could fight for three or four days."

Fleischer identified Ali as the fastest heavyweight in history, so he wasn't someone automatically inclined to dismiss newer boxers as inferior to the old timers, as many might. It is therefore extremely significant that he rated Dempsey's handspeed against Willard as slightly superior to what Louis displayed at his fastest. As for Dempsey's footspeed and lateral mobility, that is readily apparent on those early films.

The first hook Dempsey dropped the steel chinned and ultra durable Willard with caved in Jess's cheekbone. It came up from the floor, cloaked behind his right to Willard's chest, and even though Willard was retreating and knew it was coming, he couldn't avoid it, as tall as he was. Read Dempsey's detailed instructions on how to execute a left hook perfectly, and then compare his description against a frame by frame analysis of that first knockdown, and you will see that he got everything into it.

How tough and durable was Willard? He took everything that modern sized (not steroid inflated) Luther McCarty, Carl Morris, Frank Moran, Floyd Johnson, and Gunboat Smith could dish out, all for at least ten rounds. When Jess was combacking at 41, it took Firpo everything he had to finally land Willard in round eight. (Even then, Jess took the count on a knee, with his hand on a rope, looking as though he was about to rise.)

Finally, Big Jess took absolutely everything a beefed up Jack Johnson could throw at him in 110 degree heat under the Havana sun for 26 rounds, before winning the title. If nothing else, Willard was an insanely tough and durable customer.

Concerning Dempsey's power, in the third round against Willard, he buried a hook into Jess's right short ribs, fracturing them and hopping Willard into the air. (This was not like the delayed hop knockdown which Frazier sustained against Foreman. This time, the force behind Dempsey's hook alone was responsible for propelling Willard skyward.) Nobody had ever floored or stopped Bill Brennan in 67 fights, when Jack squared off with him for the first time. He floored Brennan six times, hitting him so hard for the last knockdown that KO Bill's legs locked up, with the resulting bone fracturing putting Brennan out of comission for four months.

In round 12 of the title fight rematch with Brennan, trailing on points after a lackuster showing, Dempsey demonstrated his late round power by flooring the larger, rock hard Brennan for the count with devastating body punches to the chest. Dempsey was the only one who knocked out Brennan twice.

Dempsey was always modest about his power when comparing it to that of Louis and Marciano, claiming that he had to knock down an opponent repeatedly before they stayed down. Read between the lines here. Dempsey could have never knocked out Billy Conn with the sort of multipunch combination Louis used, because every single one of those punches would have been a knockdown blow coming from Dempsey's fists.

Only one person ever dropped the rock hard Tony Galento in competition. Louis. But even Louis could not floor Galento for the count. The one man who was able to pull that trick, did it while sparring against Two-Ton. Dempsey. ("That's how you throw a left hook Tony. Now, go get yourself a manager!")

How tough was Dempsey? Well, when he was 21, he got the best of John Lester Johnson over ten rounds, despite Johnson breaking one of his ribs. How much endurance did he have? Well, he took 12 of 15 rounds against a late peaking Tommy Gibbons, and was having Gibbons going at the end. (After that match, when Gibbons was asked how hard Dempsey hit, Tommy didn't say a word. He simply removed the hat he was wearing, which revealed the lumps, bumps, welts and bruises all over the top of his head. Years later, when Jack Blackburn was discussing his charge's rematch with Godoy, Blackburn talked about how Louis would give ground to Arturo, sliding from side to side as he did so, and pummel the sides of Godoy's low crouched body and head, "but not the top of the head, because that's too hard." Not for Dempsey it wasn't, as Gibbons could painfully attest.)

Miske only had one official defeat in his 103 bouts (a 12 round decision to Kid Norfolk). He was dropped for the count by Dempsey in three rounds. The three knockdowns Miske sustained in that title fight were the only three visits to the floor that Miske sustained in all those 103 contests.

Dempsey's hip hurt him for the rest of his life, when he landed on it after Firpo shoved him out of the ring. But turnabout's fair play, and when ringsiders shoved him back in, he finished the round, then had his back to the ropes early in the next round, when he triggered that massive uppercut which put Firpo out of his misery.

Gene Tunney admitted that in 20 rounds of action, he was only able to get three or four clear shots at a worn, hampered and misfiring Dempsey. For his part, Dempsey only got two good shots in on Gene's head, but they resulted in the only knockdown of Tunney's 87 match career.

What about Marciano? Well, he wasn't even able to get Charles against the ropes in their first match, and was trailing after 12 rounds. Tiger Ted Lowry went the ten round distance with Marciano twice, and said that Archie Moore was actually the aversary he was hit hardest by. For his part, Moore told reporters after his loss to Marciano, "He's the strongest man I ever fought. I don't know that he hits the hardest, but he certainly hits hard enough (which is really what matters anyway). However, by the end of Archie's career, he was able to assert in no uncertain terms that the hardest single punch he was ever struck by was the first right hand Yvon Durelle dropped him with in their classic initial encounter.

Rocky took a fantastic beating in the opening round of his title challenge of Walcott. He'd have a really rough time staying on his feet against the faster and harder hitting Dempsey, who would have been continually on the balls of his feet, knees bent, moving laterally in that pigeon toed manner of his, feet always pointed towards his target. Dempsey had height, reach, speed, balance, mobility, resistance to cuts, longer experience behind him at his peak, and proven punching power against naturally modern sized heavyweights. He'd also be getting under Rocky's overhand right.

The referee would not be counting ten in this one. Dempsey either forces a late stoppage on facial damage to Marciano, wins a clear cut 15 round decision, or forces the referee to stop it early with repeated knockdowns, ala Johansson/Patterson I, or Foreman/Frazier I.

Very few who eyewitnessed both Dempsey and Marciano at their peaks favored Rocky to win such a fantasy matchup, and some of these nostalgic oldtimers did believe that Louis would have taken Dempsey, so it wasn't simply a matter of older always being better with these veteran observers.

To me, the final clincher is an examination of his movement in round 15 against Gibbons. A comparison of Dempsey's final round performance against his opening round performance hardly presents any discernable difference. Marciano would not have been able to wear a peak Dempsey down over 15 rounds, considering how the post prime Dempsey looked against Gibbons at the end.

I have tremendous respect for what Marciano was able to achieve however. Being under six feet tall, with short arms, slow feet and tender skin, he truly made the most of what he was born with, and it was always good enough. My choice of Dempsey is based on the expectation that Rocky's heart would not be enough to overcome the physical disadvantages he'd have against Dempsey.
Listening to the radio broadcast, I thought Rocky was ahead by round 12.
Dempsey1238 is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 09-23-2009, 11:57 AM   #77
Dempsey1238
Champion
East Side Guru
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 5,015
vCash: 1000
Default Re: Marciano Vs Dempsey

1 Charles
2 Charles
3 Charles
4 Charles
5 Marciano
6 Marciano(Turning point of the fight.
7 Marciano
8 Charles
9 Marciano
10 Marciano
11 Marciano
12 about even
13 Marciano
14 Marciano and 15 Rocky.


Ok it was 6 rounds to 5 leading in 12,,
Dempsey1238 is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2009, 05:35 PM   #78
leverage
Contender
ESB Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 677
vCash: 1000
Default Re: Macriano Vs Dempsey

Quote:
Originally Posted by Maxmomer View Post
Dempsey wins 10 times out of 10. Everything Marciano could do, Dempsey could do better and then some. Pretty much equel power, just as durable, better defense, significantly longer reach, better overall boxing skills, better mobility, faster hands, better accuracy. You name it.
I disagree. While dempsey was certainly much faster than marciano and perhaps more accurate, he was inferior in 3 critical areas; punching power, stamina and chin. Marciano was a notch higher when it came to punching power (even though dempsey could thump as well) and he had the better chin. He also got stronger as a fight progressed.

Also, while marciano was no defensive genious he was better than most people realize. He would crouch low and make his opponents punch down to him, and he would launch those muderous uppercuts from below. He was deceptive and was not hit flush as often as most experts would suppose.

This would be a toe to toe slugfest which would be decided by two factors; punching power and chin, and these favor marciano.

Dempsey was a fighter ahead of his time who probably would have done well in any era but imo he was a tad overrated.
leverage is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2009, 06:33 PM   #79
Hydraulix
Left Hook From Hell..
ESB Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 879
vCash: 1000
Default Re: Macriano Vs Dempsey

Quote:
Originally Posted by Maxmomer View Post
Dempsey wins 10 times out of 10. Everything Marciano could do, Dempsey could do better and then some.
My thoughts exactly. Dempsey had faster handspeed and steamrolled his opponents at the opening bell. Rocky took a while to warm up to his task, plus he had a tendency to cut. Dempsey's punchers were also very accuarate. The hungry, hobo version of Dempsey stops Rocky early.
Hydraulix is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2009, 09:12 PM   #80
Maxmomer
Belt holder
ESB Addict
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,690
vCash: 619
Default Re: Macriano Vs Dempsey

Quote:
Originally Posted by leverage View Post
I disagree. While dempsey was certainly much faster than marciano and perhaps more accurate, he was inferior in 3 critical areas; punching power, stamina and chin. Marciano was a notch higher when it came to punching power (even though dempsey could thump as well) and he had the better chin. He also got stronger as a fight progressed.

Also, while marciano was no defensive genious he was better than most people realize. He would crouch low and make his opponents punch down to him, and he would launch those muderous uppercuts from below. He was deceptive and was not hit flush as often as most experts would suppose.

This would be a toe to toe slugfest which would be decided by two factors; punching power and chin, and these favor marciano.

Dempsey was a fighter ahead of his time who probably would have done well in any era but imo he was a tad overrated.
This is an old thread, my views on Dempsey have changed since I first posted on here, but I still pick him over Rocky. I think Dempsey was faster, more accurate, more mobile, and had better defense and if there was any difference in their power or physical strength at all it was marginal. Rocky does have the better chin, but he was hurtable and dropable. I still believe that Dempsey was just a better, more skillful fighter than Marciano, and has more advantages in his favor. Stamina and chin are really the only two things Marciano has over Dempsey, and I don't think it's enough to overcome Dempsey's faster hands, more accurate punches and mobility. I think it would end with a mid-round stoppage in Dempsey's favor. Rocky could win, though, Dempsey's KO loss to Flynn puts a big question mark over his chin, so Rocky by stoppage isn't out of the question.
Maxmomer is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2009, 05:25 AM   #81
fists of fury
Champion
East Side Guru
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: March for Revenge
Posts: 6,044
vCash: 1887
Default Re: Macriano Vs Dempsey

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hydraulix View Post
Rocky took a while to warm up to his task, plus he had a tendency to cut. Dempsey's punchers were also very accuarate. .
He took a while to get into his groove in the championship years, but he just seemed that kind of fighter who needed to fight often. He wasn't by nature a slow starter, although he seemed to get better as the rounds progressed.
I agree cuts could be a big factor in determining the outcome. Fascinating fight this. About the only fight involving Rocky I'd love to see more would be against Joe Frazier.
fists of fury is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2009, 10:23 AM   #82
mcvey
P4P King
East Side VIP
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: The Garden Of England
Posts: 21,357
vCash: 1000
Default Re: Marciano Vs Dempsey

Quote:
Originally Posted by tays001 View Post
Who Wins This Fight And How I Go With Marciano By Ko In 11 I Just Think It Would Be A War And Marciano Would Come Out The Victor In This War. Give Me Your Thoughts
Dempsey for me and by tko.
mcvey is online now  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2009, 05:31 PM   #83
ClintMagnum
Antitheist
ESB Full Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 301
vCash: 900
Default Re: Marciano Vs Dempsey

Marciano by late stoppage. Too cute and strong for Dempsey who IMO wasn't even the best of his generation.
ClintMagnum is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2009, 11:40 PM   #84
pugilist_boyd
BUSTED UP PUG
ESB Full Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: missouri,usa
Posts: 414
vCash: 1000
Default Re: Marciano Vs Dempsey

unless its early 1900,s dempsey by tko by 10 ---prime for prime
pugilist_boyd is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2009, 04:45 AM   #85
Grinder
Dude, don't call me Dude
ESB Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,492
vCash: 1000
Default Re: Marciano Vs Dempsey

If you asked people to vote on the better fighter, without the stylistic head-to-head issue, Dempsey would come out on top.

When you analyse the stylistic problem of the Rock for Dempsey, I think you still find that Dempsey will be too much for the Rock. Firstly, I can not see Rocky winning a decision based on Dempsey's skills. Secondly, Dempsey is generally regarded as having excellent power, so it is arguable that he could possibly KO Rocky, although that is definitely not a guarantee.

Rocky had excellent power and carried it late, but does he have the power to KO Dempsey? The only situation I see Rocky KOing Dempsey is late in the fight similar to his win over Jersey Joe. He would be behind on the cards and the punishment he dished out would catch up with Dempsey or he would land flush. However, the man had 62 fights and was only KOed once, and that appears to have been thrown.

Statistically, you must concur that Dempsey and Rocky would be standing at the end with a UD going to Dempsey. Next most likely outcome is Dempsey KOing Rock anywhere from round 2 onwards. Finally, the Rock KOing Manassa mauler late is the third most likely possibility.

PS Marciano is my favourite fighter.
Grinder is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2009, 06:11 PM   #86
MrMarvel
Contender
ESB Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 898
vCash: 1000
Default Re: Marciano Vs Dempsey

Marciano. Dempsey is overrated. So is Marciano.
MrMarvel is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2009, 12:42 AM   #87
Cheese
Journeyman
ESB Jr Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 138
vCash: 1000
Default Re: Marciano Vs Dempsey

Man this would be a good one. I think I'll go with Dempsey. Marciano's punches kick like a mule, but his punches and wild. I think Dempsey would exploit Marciano's wild swinging and punish him every time. I really don't see the fight lasting to long as a result.
Cheese is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2009, 04:54 AM   #88
turpinr
Belt holder
ESB Addict
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: lancashire
Posts: 4,849
vCash: 1000
Default Re: Marciano Vs Dempsey

Quote:
Originally Posted by MrMarvel View Post
Marciano. Dempsey is overrated. So is Marciano.
agreed
turpinr is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2009, 08:22 AM   #89
Mr Butt
Champion
East Side Guru
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: out preaching for the church of benn
Posts: 6,589
vCash: 1054
Default Re: Marciano Vs Dempsey

dempsey by stoppage around the 9th (cuts)
Mr Butt is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2009, 08:54 AM   #90
he grant
Historian/Film Maker
East Side Guru
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 7,533
vCash: 1000
Default Re: Marciano Vs Dempsey

Ste, a first ... never , ever heard Marciano's style referred to as cute ...
he grant is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Reply

Boxing News 24 Forum > Boxing > Classic Boxing Forum

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump





All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:44 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Boxing News 24 Forum 2013