|
|
|
#4 |
|
ESB Junkie
East Side VIP
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 30,733
vCash: 1000 |
I'd take Norton's better jab and boxing skill to win him a UD here. I'm sure some will say Lyle by KO, but Lyle wasnt a massive puncher and Norton didnt crumble against ever adequate puncher he faced otherwise he wouldnt arguably be 5-0 against Ali, Holmes and Quarry
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
มวยสากล
East Side VIP
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: @ferociousflea
Posts: 44,057
vCash: 75 |
Barring Lyle wiping Norton out early (Lyle was a solid hitter but not a MASSIVE puncher IMO) I think Norton wins a UD in a very competitive contest where Lyle lands the harder shots but Norton wins on mixing up his approach.
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Gatekeeper
ESB Full Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 338
vCash: 1000 |
Don't underestimate Lyle's power. Look what happened in the Foreman bout. Norton didn't have as strong a set of whiskers as George did. If Lyle clipped him the way he did Foreman, I am not so sure that that Norton would survive. I really don't recall George Foreman ever being on the floor only against Lyle and Ali in Zaire. So Ron Lyle must have had some power in his punches.
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Dominating a decade
East Side VIP
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 14,750
vCash: 1000 |
I see this a competitive match that could go either way. Lyle seems to have a better chance at winning via KO, but I think Norton's chance of winning the decision is the most likely outcome.
So I'll go with Norton. |
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Champion
East Side Guru
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 5,445
vCash: 1000 |
Quote:
If Lyle had such a big punch he would of got the chinny Shavers out of there a lot earlier. |
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Champion
East Side Guru
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: New York
Posts: 8,186
vCash: 1000 |
Norton was a good fighter except when he had to back up, he could not fight that way and it was proven over every puncher he faced except a drug and alcohal wasted Jerry Quarry who admitted he was spent and did not train for the fight. Jerry's 2nd wife was a party girl and got him into it late in life. Still I think Lyle was overated as a puncher but still hit harder than 180lb Jose Louis Garcia who KO'd a young Ken and a Scott ledoux who had an older Ken down 2 times but when Ken was backed up, it was always a matter of time, Foreman,Shavers,Cooney,Garcia,....I think Ken had the better skill but Lyle did apply pressure and may be the wrong style for him...I really think this fight boils down to how much pressure Lyle can put on Ken..If he applys it and wants it he stops Ken. If Ken keeps his distance and keeps Lyle at bay, he wins a UD
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Undisputed Champion
East Side VIP
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 12,184
vCash: 1000 |
Quote:
Good match, i don't think Lyle has the early aggression, sheer skill or effective pressure to get Norton. But really, lets check the scheduled programme here. Was Norton really that susceptible to the early KO? This topic deserves a thread of it's own. |
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|