|
|
|
#17 | |
|
Diamond Dog
East Side VIP
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 63,260
vCash: 1000 |
Quote:
It is, and I don't think it will be run corruptly. But historically, I don't think the likely perception would be that it's right. Imagine if Don Kind owned the WBC? |
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Barry
East Side VIP
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Scotland
Posts: 26,118
vCash: 836 |
Quote:
What you onw about Don King practilly ran the WBC in the 80s |
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,404
vCash: 987 |
sulaman is bad enough.If you think about it the orgs make their money by % of purses ,so a popular fighter makes them more money thats a highly fishy conflict of interest
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Undisputed Champion
East Side VIP
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: in a boxing gym near you
Posts: 10,498
vCash: 1000 |
It hasnt been changed yet, but the point is it was, and would always be better, when it was totally impartial because of no connection to a "promoter".
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Undisputed Champion
East Side VIP
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: "Somebody may beat me, but they are going to have to bleed to do it."
Posts: 12,052
vCash: 856 |
As long as Golden Boy or any promontional company owns the Ring there should be questions?
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|