boxing
Forum Home Boxing Forum European British Classic Aussie MMA Training
Go Back   Boxing News 24 Forum > Boxing > British Boxing Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 02-02-2010, 06:47 PM   #16
Davies
Belt holder
ESB Addict
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: He who fears being conquered is sure of defeat
Posts: 1,916
vCash: 4614
Default Re: Why wasnt this a no-contest?

Its hard to say wether or not he threw the punch before the ref said stop,

Was it declared a no-contest or was it a W on baker's record?
Davies is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 02-02-2010, 07:22 PM   #17
Top Dog
Belt holder
ESB Addict
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,140
vCash: 1000
Default Re: Why wasnt this a no-contest?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Davies View Post
Its hard to say wether or not he threw the punch before the ref said stop,

Was it declared a no-contest or was it a W on baker's record?
Yeah your right, but the ref was pushing the guy back when he was flushed, should have been a NC
Top Dog is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2010, 08:10 PM   #18
Mandanda
SkillspayBills
East Side VIP
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: South London
Posts: 13,021
vCash: 1000
Default Re: Why wasnt this a no-contest?

Barker should of got a count. Peach of a left hook he threw...i don't think he did it on the sly purely accidental imo. It's hard one but based on character and also the way he threw it i doubt he did it knowing it was a break.
Mandanda is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2010, 09:10 PM   #19
icemax
Indian Red
East Side VIP
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 13,616
vCash: 664
Default Re: Why wasnt this a no-contest?

Quote:
Originally Posted by kosaros View Post
He said "stop boxing" - this means that Barker threw an illegal punch, which means the contest should have been declared as a no contest, or Barker should have been disqualified - neither happened and Barker got the win and that was Parris' decision to make, and he got it wrong.
Samuels hadn't stopped and was moving in on Barker...you could argue that Barker was following the refs instructions in defending himself at all times
icemax is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2010, 09:25 PM   #20
kosaros
Undisputed Champion
East Side VIP
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 13,326
vCash: 999
Default Re: Why wasnt this a no-contest?

Quote:
Originally Posted by icemax View Post
Samuels hadn't stopped and was moving in on Barker...you could argue that Barker was following the refs instructions in defending himself at all times
Quite right, I was a little hasty in condemning Barker
kosaros is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2010, 09:30 PM   #21
TFFP
The Eskimo
East Side VIP
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Reykjavík
Posts: 22,529
vCash: 2500
Default Re: Why wasnt this a no-contest?

Dodgy piece of officiating

Wait a minute who are the involved parties...






















OH thats right Dave Parris.

Will anything be done about this crock of **** ref? Don't bet anything on it.

Last edited by TFFP; 02-02-2010 at 11:15 PM.
TFFP is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2010, 11:13 PM   #22
Robert
Belt holder
ESB Addict
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 1,671
vCash: 1000
Default Re: Why wasnt this a no-contest?

i though barker should have been counted
Robert is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2010, 04:50 AM   #23
saturday_kid
Belt holder
ESB Addict
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: North West, UK
Posts: 1,787
vCash: 905
Default Re: Why wasnt this a no-contest?

Quote:
Originally Posted by brown bomber View Post
If Samuals had of done the same to Barker he'd probably been disqualified.... Smauals stoppage defeat against Groves was bull **** as well.
Whate he said, disgusted me that.
saturday_kid is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2010, 05:35 AM   #24
icemax
Indian Red
East Side VIP
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 13,616
vCash: 664
Default Re: Why wasnt this a no-contest?

Quote:
Originally Posted by TFFP View Post
OH thats right Dave Parris.

Will anything be done about this crock of **** ref? Don't bet anything on it.
Come 1st March 2010 he will not be able to officiate in a British ring again
icemax is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2010, 06:55 AM   #25
Robney
ᴻᴼ ᴸᴼᴻᴳᴲᴿ ᴲ۷ᴵᴸ
East Side VIP
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: A hollow vulcano lair!
Posts: 26,532
vCash: 5350
Default Re: Why wasnt this a no-contest?

It was definitely a no contest... It was a strange situation, with the flash knockdown and all but the ref had to much influence in the ko also.

very bad if this isn't changed to a NC
Robney is online now  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2010, 07:30 AM   #26
avidlemon
Belt holder
ESB Addict
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Big daddy avid sez smigg will be back!
Posts: 3,429
vCash: 1000
Default Re: Why wasnt this a no-contest?

barker should have got a count, end of. great ko, but, NC without a doubt. Barker knows it aswell
avidlemon is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2010, 09:26 AM   #27
Mr. V.I.P.
Belt holder
ESB Addict
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Come at me bro
Posts: 2,633
vCash: 75
Default Re: Why wasnt this a no-contest?

Dave Parris involved as usual.
Mr. V.I.P. is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2010, 09:28 AM   #28
Sai
Contender
ESB Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Sydney, Aus
Posts: 1,478
vCash: 110
Default Re: Why wasnt this a no-contest?

Obvious NC. Hard for Samuels to defend himself when old Daves got his arm holding his right hand down. Not malicious from Barker, obviously just reactive, but thats pretty much the definition of something that should be ruled an NC
Sai is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Reply

Boxing News 24 Forum > Boxing > British Boxing Forum

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:03 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Boxing News 24 Forum 2015