|
|
|
#16 |
|
Champion
East Side Guru
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: New York
Posts: 8,172
vCash: 1000 |
Interesting matchup Chris, With all that I know of Listons trouble with speedy guys. This one is a tough fight for him. Gene had great legs and Sonny was not really a wear you down guy. Sonny would keep Gene on his toes and speed and movement would have to be constant. I see Sonny with swolen eyes and shoulder problems from reaching and Gene pulls out a 10-15 rd Close nod 115-113 115-112 114-114 if Sonny does not give up the chase with an injury
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
Champion
East Side Guru
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: New York
Posts: 8,172
vCash: 1000 |
Quote:
Fragile chinned Bob Satterfield fought a 31-1 Cleveland Williams and took his best punces and Ko'd him in 3...Sorry but Williams was a body beautifull but never really KO'd quality and I think his power was overated. In fact Walcoot and Moore were harder punchers and Charles Ko'd better fighters. In fact Rex Layne at least beat Satterfield once. |
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Champion
East Side Guru
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 7,116
vCash: 1000 |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
March 8th, 1971
East Side VIP
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Holland
Posts: 11,749
vCash: 238 |
Quote:
And is Tunney even capable of throwing a big turn-around punch, anyway? Doesn't seem to be the type, not to mention he wasn't that big a hitter, even at lower weights. |
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
Champion
East Side Guru
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: New York
Posts: 8,172
vCash: 1000 |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#21 | |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
vCash: |
Quote:
Interesting match up. My feeling is Liston was in many ways overrated as a heavyweight champ, Tunney in many ways underrated. Another thought that comes to me is the idea of physical advantages. Definitly Liston did posses some, his reach for one. However, people, even in his own time, seemed to iendow him with much more size then he actually had. Liston's prime weight hovered between 210 and 215, at most 220, but at that weight he was not really soild. Tunney fought his fights with dempsey at about 190. Of course 25 pounds is not a meaningless amount of weight, but bigger weight advantages have been overcome. Tunney would have a major speed advantage, and would have the heart and tougness not to be intimidated the way Patterson seemed to have been. As for Liston getting his hook in..he may get it in..but to be really effective he would most likely have to set it up, the way Dempsey did with his lead right hand. I am not sure if Liston would have the skill speed or ring intelligence to pull that off. I see Tunney winning a comfortable decision, or even stopping Liston on his Stole the way Ali did. Tunney could also cut him, however, if they did fight 10 times, both fighting at their prime best, I would say that in at least 3 cases Liston would catch him effectively and finish Tunney. 7fights to Tunney, 3 to Liston is my predication. |
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Undisputed Champion
East Side VIP
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Boston, Ma
Posts: 12,955
vCash: 1000 |
I think this is a horrible matchup for Gene Tunney. I am shocked at the amount of people who pick Tunney over Liston. Tunney never fought a 215lb heavyweight in his life, let alone one of the greatest of all time. Yet people pick Tunney. These same people who pick tunney are the ones who claim Marciano would never beat frank bruno because hes "too small and never proved he could beat a big heavyweight". I sense Double Standards. First off, tunney would never even get in the ring with Sonny Liston for 3 reasons. Liston was Big, He was Black, and he was Good.
Back to Styles.. Tunney's whole style was built upon fighting smaller guys. He loved to use his long reach and range to box on the outside all night long. Trouble is his 6' in height and only 77" reach are going to fall short of Liston's measurements. He will not be able to control Liston at length with his jab. Bad News is Tunney does not have a backup plan. He was not a very effective inside fighter..he loved to clinch. His superior strength against small fighters allowed him to control the clinches. Against Liston, he will be the weaker of the two, and will be the one being manhandled in the clinches. On top of that, Liston was an excellent inside fighter, knowing how to rip short uppercuts and hooks to the head and body. Liston was also so strong. One of the strongest in history. Knew how to use his strength inside. Tunney also had trouble fighting on the ropes if trapped, which is why dempsey put him down. Tunney had a bad habit of keeping his hands too low which could be suicide against Listons long jab, and offensive assault. I like Liston here either by mid round stoppage or unanimous decision. Liston is a complete fighter. He can beat tunney in every way. Tunney was not like a Walcott in regards to using misdirections and taking unpredictable diagonal angles. Tunney would simply circle his opponent using fast feet...very effective but very predictable. Enough for Liston to track down and destroy. |
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Marquez UD12 Pacquiao.
East Side Guru
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 7,657
vCash: 122 |
Liston by knockout. everytime liston would catch up with gene Tunney it wouldn't be pretty because he's the bigger stronger man. anyway that 82/84 inch Long reach would give him problems as well
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|