|
|
|
#2 |
|
Champion
East Side Guru
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Auburn, WA
Posts: 6,894
vCash: 1000 |
Sorry to say I've never seen Saldivar.
I will say this........I've read he was a strong, come-forward type of slugger. Guys like that stood almost no chance against Sanchez. |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Champion
East Side Guru
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 7,301
vCash: 1000 |
Saldivar was agressive, but he was by no means a one dimensional brawler. He could box and had very good skills. However, not as good as Sanchez's.
Saldivar would hang in all the way, but probably lose a close decision which really, looked inevitable from the early rounds. |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,495
vCash: 1000 |
saldivar had excellent skills, thogh probably a little too methodical and offensively minded for Sanchez.
His great rival Winstone would have a beter chance against Sanchez with his jab and finesse. |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,692
vCash: 1000 |
Salidvar has one of the best resumes among the featherweights, he's very underrated IMO. Famechon, legra, winstone x3, ramos and laguna, thats a fabulous resume alot better than salvador sanchez's.
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|