|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Contender
ESB Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 926
vCash: 2355 |
Quote:
when Bradley got hurt you could tell by his face he was concentrating for his life he was either punching back or trying to duck, when Alvarado got hurt after all the punches landed you could see his face he didnt have a clue wtf he was doing, it looked like he was trying to block but couldnt move his arms, he didnt look focused at all like Bradley did |
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Champion
East Side Guru
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,012
vCash: 1000 |
Would have been slightly premature, however we've all seen stoppages much worse. Bradley by his own admission he thought he was concussed and that is a dangerous condition to be fighting in. Realistically he was one straight shot away from being stopped.
|
|
|
|
#21 | |
|
Contender
ESB Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,191
vCash: 235 |
Quote:
In my opinion should a 10-8 round only be given when the fighter is being dominated like bradley and not fighting back. Like some of the rounds in the Bute - froch fight. |
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Champion
East Side Guru
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 9,102
vCash: 835 |
even though he was punching back that would have been an amazing upset, i am a big time Bradley fan but i probably would be jumping around because that would be a great boxing moment
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,770
vCash: 1000 |
Many times (through the whole fight, not just rnd 2) it seemed like it was just one flush punch away from being stopped... but it just never quite happened... Timmy was still moving and throwing back... Ruslan got too excited and wild, forgot to go to the body, smothered himself a bit,,, and just didn't place his shot's quite well enough to get the TKO at those crucial points when Tim was on Queer St.
Either way, it would not have been the worst stoppage ever... (we've seen much worst)but I think the ref made the right call letting it go on. |
|
|
|
#26 |
|
Left Hook from HELL!!!
East Side Guru
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 8,285
vCash: 1000 |
It would've been too early in my opinion - as I felt Rios-Alvarado was an early stoppage. You stop a fight too soon and you possibly rob everyone of a great event (like we saw Saturday). This is why I love the standing 8 count and have no idea why we don't bring it back. It's useful in these situations.
Here's the double edged sword of this debate: A) Alvarado was saved from taking any real serious damage with that early stoppage, but he was robbed of a chance to recover and come back B) Bradley no doubt left years of his life in that ring Saturday and may never be the same, but he won over fans and what a fight! |
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Nash Equilibrium Debunker
East Side VIP
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Boston
Posts: 123,317
vCash: 9953 |
Even more shocking than Provodnikov getting to Bradley and putting him in such rough shape was Bradley actually soldiering through it and eventually rallying back.
If Pat Russell had stopped it any time from late in the 1st through anywhere in the 2nd, I wouldn't have begrudged him the call - but I'm glad he didn't because we got to witness some really special shit. |
|
|
|
#28 |
|
Journeyman
ESB Jr Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 234
vCash: 500 |
I could see the call for it from a referee's POV but I personally wouldn't have stopped it.
I'd have been slightly disappointed but not overtly angry at that decision. Let's all just be thankful the fight took place in America and not the UK. Fight would have been stopped as soon as a stiff jab landed. |
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|