|
|
|
#1 |
|
Dominating a decade
East Side VIP
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 12,785
vCash: 1000 |
If Rocky Marciano and Joe Frazier switched eras and fought the exact same guys, how would their career’s play out?
Could Frazier make it to 49-0? Would Rocky have beaten Ali once, or faired better vs Foreman? |
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Diamond Dog
East Side VIP
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 34,759
vCash: 1000 |
I think it's possible that Frazier could have made it to 49-0, yes, though it's not possible to insist that he could have done it, no way. It's an astonishing achievment. I think Frazier is an example of someone who could do it, and it's worth noting that Rocky didn't defend the title to many times so if Frazier did go a little soft once he came to the title he could possibly get away with it.
As for Rocky in Frazier's time, no I don't personally believe he would be able to take Ali at the fight of the century. He cuts and would be in against a fighter who can cut an opponent, for one thing, for another, though there is no question over Rocky's stamina very few fighters ahve proved themselves in possesion of Frazier's durability. Marciano-Foreman is an intreguing one, i'll look forward to what others have to sa about that. |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
P4P King
East Side VIP
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 19,155
vCash: 1000 |
I did a fairly detailed analysis on Frazier in Marciano's era last year.
I concluded that while there were danger points for Frazier he could quite plausibly make it to 49-0. I also did Marciano in Fraziers era but in place of Ali instead. |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Hardcore......to the max!
ESB Addict
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: The Kingdom of Fife, Scotland.
Posts: 2,848
vCash: 1000 |
Frazier would get to 49-0 probably even greater.
Marciano would get beaten by Ali and Foreman. That is if he would be allowed to fight at heavyweight! |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,406
vCash: 1000 |
One thing about Marciano is that when he got you on the ropes he was absoloutly brutal, even more so than Frazier.This makes me think he'd do even better against Ali, in the first fight anyway. Foreman may be another matter, though.George was at his best against guys who crouched in front of him like Frazier, Norton did and like Marciano would.I would still give Rocky a chance though, because he was a bit more durable (except for the skin) than Smokin Joe , punched harder, and did have better stamina in long fights.Rocky was also able to crouch down even farther, making himself less of a target against George than Joe was.
Joe in Rockys era would certainly beat everybody Marciano did, and probably could have gone 49-0, yes. |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: March for Revenge
Posts: 4,682
vCash: 1325 |
Frazier going 49-0 in Rocky's era is plausible, but unlikely. Just because Rocky did it, it doesn't mean others could. It takes an almost uncanny level of consistency to achieve 49-0, irrespective of era. I think Walcott could have given Frazier fits with that sneaky style of his.
Could Rocky do a 'Frazier'? Possible. He would have to be in absolute peak form to beat Ali though. In my mind, the guys Frazier beat would get beaten by Marciano too. The danger man for Marciano is Foreman, whom I think would be too strong for Rocky, just like he was for Frazier. Marciano and Frazier are quite similar in many ways, particularly in the intangibles, although I give Marciano the edge in stamina and durability. |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
R.I.P. - George Jones
ESB Addict
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: The Grand Tour
Posts: 2,027
vCash: 75 |
Basically, both men would assume the same success that the other actually achieved... although it is important to wonder how much Frazier would've done, not having an Ali and Foreman there to shorten his career so much. Don't think he would've been undefeated though, because he would've hung around long enough for a Patterson or Liston to defeat him.
As for Marciano, we'd get a better sense of how good he really was, since he'd have the task of getting through a much stronger crop of HW contenders to get to the championship. |
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: March for Revenge
Posts: 4,682
vCash: 1325 |
Quote:
Personally, I don't think so. |
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
R.I.P. - George Jones
ESB Addict
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: The Grand Tour
Posts: 2,027
vCash: 75 |
Quote:
I wouldn't use "superior" (which summizes a valuble difference), but "better", yes. |
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Undisputed Champion
East Side VIP
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: England
Posts: 11,327
vCash: 15000 |
I don't think there is anyone on Marciano's resume who had enough to beat Frazier. Like I've said before, Marciano was the prototype for Frazier. He just wasn't as good, I don't think. One main disadvantage Frazier has is benig noe-handed, but don't think it's that significant.
Frazier would probably get beyond 49-0 with little problems - Certainly not from people like LaStarza. As for Marciano, I don't think he would hae been as shot as Frazier was post the first Ali fight. I think he would have had a much better career after that fight. I think he goes 0-5 against Ali and Foreman though. Size is important too. Considering both men had almost identical physical attributes, that 20lbs is going to make a big difference. Frazier would be the bigger man in most of Marciano's fights, whereas Marciano would be tiny compared to Ali and others. |
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: March for Revenge
Posts: 4,682
vCash: 1325 |
Here is a tale of the tape of the two fighters. Joe is really only much larger than Rocky in the thigh area.
Marciano: Frazier: Reach: 68 73 1/2 Chest normal: 39 42 Chest expanded: 42 44 Waist: 32 34 Biceps: 14 15 Neck: 16¾ 17 1/2 Wrist: 7½ 7 Calf: 14¾ 13 Ankle: 10 11 Thigh: 22 26 Fist: 11½ 13 Forearm: 12 13 |
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Undisputed Champion
East Side VIP
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 12,586
vCash: 1000 |
Quote:
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|