|
|
|
#1 |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: you´re not alive unless you´re almost dying!!
Posts: 1,767
vCash: 1000 |
who wins the battle of these outstanding featherweights.
lopez was perhaps the hardest one shot hitter the devision had ever seen. pedroza perhaps its greatest bodypuncher. both were very tall, pedroza 5´8 (average height for a welterweight) and lopez was 5´7. overall, i think pedroza was the better technitian. he could box at long range behind a jab or he could get inside and fight real dirty. he was not a big hitter, but his bodyblows wore out most opponents. lopez was a classic one punch hitter. he jused his jab just to set up that big right hand. never cared to much about defense. but when he hit you.......goodnight. neither one had great chins. lopez was down more often than i can remember. but one has to remember that pedroza also suffered a couple of ko´s earlier in his career. i think this would be really exciting. lopez would drop pedroza early, maybe even more than once. but slowly by the mid rounds i see pedroza turning this around with his sustained bodyattack and eventually stop lopez in a thriller. pedroza ko14 lopez. |
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Journeyman
ESB Jr Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 191
vCash: 1000 |
Good match-up and I'm a big fan of both guys but I have to agree with Sal and see a Pedroza win by Decision rather than the late TKO that Sanchez realised over Danny. . . . twice.
Pedroza usually found a way to win his bouts whether by dubious methods or otherwise but the guy was in a bit higher class than Lopez who may not have had the greatest chin but had a tremendous heart and was a hugely entertaining fighter. I was thinking about a Wilfredo Gomez v Danny Lopez fight at 126lb the other day as it was supposedly meant to happen afer Wilfredo beat Nestor Jimenez - apparently Gil Clancy was going to play match-maker. . . . would have been another interesting one. |
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Contender
ESB Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 637
vCash: 1000 |
I'm suprised about Lopez, does everyone really think he was a huge hitter? From most accounts yes, but his style was an enigma, he threw heaps of punches yet was a one shot KO artist?
Weird
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Undisputed Champion
East Side VIP
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 12,184
vCash: 1000 |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Undisputed Champion
East Side VIP
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 12,184
vCash: 1000 |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Journeyman
ESB Jr Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 191
vCash: 1000 |
The first major televised fight I saw in San Diego after getting out of Navy boot camp was Zamora vs. Pedroza. I knew Zamora's reputation but little about Pedroza, other than that he was given a good shot at taking the bantamweight title away. But Zamora clocked him with that brutal left hook and that's all she wrote.
I gotta admit, I'm a Little Red Lopez fan because I saw several of his fights and admired the way he rebounded from adversity, both to get off the canvas or withstand punishment, and to snap back from a losing streak to claim the title. I'll go with Lopez on this one. No way it reaches 15 rounds, tho', not the way he and Pedroza fought. Lopez, TKO in 9. And I'll bet Danny would hafta scrape himself off the canvas at least once during the first three rounds - he was a bit of a slow starter. |
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
P4P King
East Side VIP
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: The Sea of Tranquility
Posts: 22,203
vCash: 1000 |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Champion
East Side Guru
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: South of London
Posts: 9,787
vCash: 0 |
Quote:
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|