Ricky Hatton most dominant champ @140...

IrnBruMan · 08-12-2007, 03:33 AM

...EVER with the initials 'RH'.

No argument, it's not even up for debate.

This should be fun.

brooklyn1550 · 08-12-2007, 03:36 AM

Pryor, Tszyu, and Chavez were all more dominating to name a few

Sai · 08-12-2007, 03:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by muttley

...EVER.

No argument, it's not even up for debate.

This should be fun.

Agree fully!

IrnBruMan · 08-12-2007, 03:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by brooklyn1550

Pryor, Tszyu, and Chavez were all more dominating to name a few

Hatton beat the most dominant champ at 140 (Tszyu, who unified 140 for the first time in 32 years), therefore he is the most dominant champ at 140.

No question about it.

You are entitled to your opinion but that's all it is, compared to my FACTS.

Fallow · 08-12-2007, 03:50 AM

That does not make him the most dominant champ ever.

That's like saying Hasim Rahman was the most dominant heavyweight champ ever after he sparked Lewis.

Dantes · 08-12-2007, 03:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by muttley

...EVER.

No argument, it's not even up for debate.

This should be fun.

I concur.

reed_man02 · 08-12-2007, 03:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by brooklyn1550

Pryor, Tszyu, and Chavez were all more dominating to name a few

I agree.

IrnBruMan · 08-12-2007, 03:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fallow

That does not make him the most dominant champ ever.

That's like saying Hasim Rahman was the most dominant heavyweight champ ever after he sparked Lewis.

Subscribe to the bigtime9 brand of logic or kick rocks kid

IrnBruMan · 08-12-2007, 03:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by reed_man02

I agree.

You are entitled to your opinion kid, but it is worthless when placed next to my FACTS.

Kick rocks kid, you're done

reed_man02 · 08-12-2007, 04:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by muttley

You are entitled to your opinion kid, but it is worthless when placed next to my FACTS.

Kick rocks kid, you're done

ok then, ill go and kick rocks, bitch.

IrnBruMan · 08-12-2007, 04:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by reed_man02

ok then, ill go and kick rocks, bitch.

Name a more dominant champ at 140.

Don't worry, I'll wait

shelterr · 08-12-2007, 04:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by brooklyn1550

Pryor, Tszyu, and Chavez were all more dominating to name a few

i agree. However he is the Lineal champ, dominant would mean that you faced and beat all of the top opposition while champ. Beating a near retired Tszyu and a Carlos Mausa who was lucky enought to run into a Vivian Harris meltdown, then moving up to welterwieght and squeaking by Collazo, just to go back down and beat Juan Urango and Jose Luis Castillo (who was fighting only his second fight at 140, the first being a nail biter to unknown Herman Ndougo) is not a sign of DOMINANCE. If he had beaten/beats Cotto, Harris, Torres, Malignaggi, Holt and Witter we could begin to talk about dominance. Ricky could still become the most dominant, but he simply hasnt fought enough tough opposition to be considered among names Tszyu, Pryor and Chavez. Each of these guys beats Ricky in their prime.

There's your FACTS.

IrnBruMan · 08-12-2007, 04:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by shelterr

i agree. However he is the Lineal champ, dominant would mean that you faced and beat all of the top opposition while champ. Beating a near retired Tszyu and a Carlos Mausa who was lucky enought to run into a Vivian Harris meltdown, then moving up to welterwieght and squeaking by Collazo, just to go back down and beat Juan Urango and Jose Luis Castillo (who was fighting only his second fight at 140, the first being a nail biter to unknown Herman Ndougo) is not a sign of DOMINANCE. If he had beaten Cotto, Harris, Torres and Witter we could begin to talk about dominance. Ricky could still become the most dominant, but he simply hasnt fought enough tough opposition to be considered among names Tszyu, Pryor and Chavez. Each of these guys beats Ricky in their prime.

There's your FACTS.

Resume has nothing to do with it.

You're talking about old school fighters.

Get with the PG and start speaking contemporary kid.

Name a more dominant champ at 140 in Hatton's era

shelterr · 08-12-2007, 04:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by muttley

Resume has nothing to do with it.

You're talking about old school fighters.

Get with the PG and start speaking contemporary kid.

Name a more dominant champ at 140 in Hatton's era

Well if your saying he's the most dominant champ since '05 i'm not gonna argue. I think that's pretty well understood and is really not worth making a post about. But you said EVER at the top of your post and EVER is a load of shit.

H . · 08-12-2007, 04:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by shelterr

i agree. However he is the Lineal champ, dominant would mean that you faced and beat all of the top opposition while champ. Beating a near retired Tszyu and a Carlos Mausa who was lucky enought to run into a Vivian Harris meltdown, then moving up to welterwieght and squeaking by Collazo, just to go back down and beat Juan Urango and Jose Luis Castillo (who was fighting only his second fight at 140, the first being a nail biter to unknown Herman Ndougo) is not a sign of DOMINANCE. If he had beaten/beats Cotto, Harris, Torres, Malignaggi, Holt and Witter we could begin to talk about dominance. Ricky could still become the most dominant, but he simply hasnt fought enough tough opposition to be considered among names Tszyu, Pryor and Chavez. Each of these guys beats Ricky in their prime.

There's your FACTS.

Pretty good.

Oh, we're talking Ricky's era now.

In that case, I agree, Hatton's the man.

08-12-2007, 03:33 AM	#1
IrnBruMan Flash sez: East Side VIP Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: "Just fucken jabbem heaps Choc!" Posts: 19,647 vCash: 1325	Ricky Hatton most dominant champ @140... ...EVER with the initials 'RH'. No argument, it's not even up for debate. This should be fun. Last edited by IrnBruMan; 08-12-2007 at 04:25 AM.
Top

08-12-2007, 03:36 AM	#2
brooklyn1550 Roberto Duran East Side VIP Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Michigan Posts: 12,401 vCash: 1000	Re: Ricky Hatton most dominant champ @140... Pryor, Tszyu, and Chavez were all more dominating to name a few
Top

08-12-2007, 03:50 AM	#5
Fallow Gatekeeper ESB Full Member Join Date: Mar 2006 Posts: 457 vCash: 1000	Re: Ricky Hatton most dominant champ @140... That does not make him the most dominant champ ever. That's like saying Hasim Rahman was the most dominant heavyweight champ ever after he sparked Lewis.
Top