Boxing  

Forum Home Boxing Forum European British Classic Aussie MMA Training
Go Back   Boxing News 24 Forum > Boxing > General Boxing Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 08-12-2007, 03:33 AM   #1
IrnBruMan
Champion
East Side Guru
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: "Just fucken jabbem heaps Choc!"
Posts: 8,236
vCash: 1325
Default Ricky Hatton most dominant champ @140...

...EVER with the initials 'RH'.

No argument, it's not even up for debate.

This should be fun.

Last edited by IrnBruMan; 08-12-2007 at 04:25 AM.
IrnBruMan is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 08-12-2007, 03:36 AM   #2
brooklyn1550
Roberto Duran
East Side VIP
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Michigan
Posts: 12,024
vCash: 1000
Default Re: Ricky Hatton most dominant champ @140...

Pryor, Tszyu, and Chavez were all more dominating to name a few
brooklyn1550 is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2007, 03:39 AM   #3
Sai
Contender
ESB Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Sydney, Aus
Posts: 1,478
vCash: 110
Default Re: Ricky Hatton most dominant champ @140...

Quote:
Originally Posted by muttley
...EVER.

No argument, it's not even up for debate.

This should be fun.
Agree fully!
Sai is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2007, 03:48 AM   #4
IrnBruMan
Champion
East Side Guru
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: "Just fucken jabbem heaps Choc!"
Posts: 8,236
vCash: 1325
Default Re: Ricky Hatton most dominant champ @140...

Quote:
Originally Posted by brooklyn1550
Pryor, Tszyu, and Chavez were all more dominating to name a few


Hatton beat the most dominant champ at 140 (Tszyu, who unified 140 for the first time in 32 years), therefore he is the most dominant champ at 140.

No question about it.

You are entitled to your opinion but that's all it is, compared to my FACTS.
IrnBruMan is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2007, 03:50 AM   #5
Fallow
Gatekeeper
ESB Full Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 447
vCash: 1000
Default Re: Ricky Hatton most dominant champ @140...

That does not make him the most dominant champ ever.

That's like saying Hasim Rahman was the most dominant heavyweight champ ever after he sparked Lewis.
Fallow is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2007, 03:51 AM   #6
Dantes
ESB Magnate
ESB Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: "Mom! The meat loaf! Fuck!"
Posts: 841
vCash: 75
Default Re: Ricky Hatton most dominant champ @140...

Quote:
Originally Posted by muttley
...EVER.

No argument, it's not even up for debate.

This should be fun.
I concur.
Dantes is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2007, 03:52 AM   #7
reed_man02
Belt holder
ESB Addict
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,379
vCash: 1391
Default Re: Ricky Hatton most dominant champ @140...

Quote:
Originally Posted by brooklyn1550
Pryor, Tszyu, and Chavez were all more dominating to name a few
I agree.
reed_man02 is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2007, 03:53 AM   #8
IrnBruMan
Champion
East Side Guru
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: "Just fucken jabbem heaps Choc!"
Posts: 8,236
vCash: 1325
Default Re: Ricky Hatton most dominant champ @140...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fallow
That does not make him the most dominant champ ever.

That's like saying Hasim Rahman was the most dominant heavyweight champ ever after he sparked Lewis.
Subscribe to the bigtime9 brand of logic or kick rocks kid
IrnBruMan is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2007, 03:55 AM   #9
IrnBruMan
Champion
East Side Guru
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: "Just fucken jabbem heaps Choc!"
Posts: 8,236
vCash: 1325
Default Re: Ricky Hatton most dominant champ @140...

Quote:
Originally Posted by reed_man02
I agree.
You are entitled to your opinion kid, but it is worthless when placed next to my FACTS.

Kick rocks kid, you're done
IrnBruMan is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2007, 04:03 AM   #10
reed_man02
Belt holder
ESB Addict
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,379
vCash: 1391
Default Re: Ricky Hatton most dominant champ @140...

Quote:
Originally Posted by muttley
You are entitled to your opinion kid, but it is worthless when placed next to my FACTS.

Kick rocks kid, you're done
ok then, ill go and kick rocks, bitch.
reed_man02 is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2007, 04:14 AM   #11
IrnBruMan
Champion
East Side Guru
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: "Just fucken jabbem heaps Choc!"
Posts: 8,236
vCash: 1325
Default Re: Ricky Hatton most dominant champ @140...

Quote:
Originally Posted by reed_man02
ok then, ill go and kick rocks, bitch.
Name a more dominant champ at 140.

Don't worry, I'll wait
IrnBruMan is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2007, 04:14 AM   #12
shelterr
Contender
ESB Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 942
vCash: 200
Default Re: Ricky Hatton most dominant champ @140...

Quote:
Originally Posted by brooklyn1550
Pryor, Tszyu, and Chavez were all more dominating to name a few
i agree. However he is the Lineal champ, dominant would mean that you faced and beat all of the top opposition while champ. Beating a near retired Tszyu and a Carlos Mausa who was lucky enought to run into a Vivian Harris meltdown, then moving up to welterwieght and squeaking by Collazo, just to go back down and beat Juan Urango and Jose Luis Castillo (who was fighting only his second fight at 140, the first being a nail biter to unknown Herman Ndougo) is not a sign of DOMINANCE. If he had beaten/beats Cotto, Harris, Torres, Malignaggi, Holt and Witter we could begin to talk about dominance. Ricky could still become the most dominant, but he simply hasnt fought enough tough opposition to be considered among names Tszyu, Pryor and Chavez. Each of these guys beats Ricky in their prime.

There's your FACTS.
shelterr is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2007, 04:16 AM   #13
IrnBruMan
Champion
East Side Guru
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: "Just fucken jabbem heaps Choc!"
Posts: 8,236
vCash: 1325
Default Re: Ricky Hatton most dominant champ @140...

Quote:
Originally Posted by shelterr
i agree. However he is the Lineal champ, dominant would mean that you faced and beat all of the top opposition while champ. Beating a near retired Tszyu and a Carlos Mausa who was lucky enought to run into a Vivian Harris meltdown, then moving up to welterwieght and squeaking by Collazo, just to go back down and beat Juan Urango and Jose Luis Castillo (who was fighting only his second fight at 140, the first being a nail biter to unknown Herman Ndougo) is not a sign of DOMINANCE. If he had beaten Cotto, Harris, Torres and Witter we could begin to talk about dominance. Ricky could still become the most dominant, but he simply hasnt fought enough tough opposition to be considered among names Tszyu, Pryor and Chavez. Each of these guys beats Ricky in their prime.

There's your FACTS.
Resume has nothing to do with it.

You're talking about old school fighters.

Get with the PG and start speaking contemporary kid.

Name a more dominant champ at 140 in Hatton's era
IrnBruMan is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2007, 04:18 AM   #14
shelterr
Contender
ESB Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 942
vCash: 200
Default Re: Ricky Hatton most dominant champ @140...

Quote:
Originally Posted by muttley
Resume has nothing to do with it.

You're talking about old school fighters.

Get with the PG and start speaking contemporary kid.

Name a more dominant champ at 140 in Hatton's era
Well if your saying he's the most dominant champ since '05 i'm not gonna argue. I think that's pretty well understood and is really not worth making a post about. But you said EVER at the top of your post and EVER is a load of shit.
shelterr is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2007, 04:21 AM   #15
H .
Champion
East Side Guru
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Chicago
Posts: 6,418
vCash: 218
Default Re: Ricky Hatton most dominant champ @140...

Quote:
Originally Posted by shelterr
i agree. However he is the Lineal champ, dominant would mean that you faced and beat all of the top opposition while champ. Beating a near retired Tszyu and a Carlos Mausa who was lucky enought to run into a Vivian Harris meltdown, then moving up to welterwieght and squeaking by Collazo, just to go back down and beat Juan Urango and Jose Luis Castillo (who was fighting only his second fight at 140, the first being a nail biter to unknown Herman Ndougo) is not a sign of DOMINANCE. If he had beaten/beats Cotto, Harris, Torres, Malignaggi, Holt and Witter we could begin to talk about dominance. Ricky could still become the most dominant, but he simply hasnt fought enough tough opposition to be considered among names Tszyu, Pryor and Chavez. Each of these guys beats Ricky in their prime.

There's your FACTS.
Pretty good.

Oh, we're talking Ricky's era now.

In that case, I agree, Hatton's the man.
H . is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Reply

Boxing News 24 Forum > Boxing > General Boxing Forum

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump





All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:23 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Boxing News 24 Forum 2013