|
|
|
#4 |
|
Gatekeeper
ESB Full Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 452
vCash: 1000 |
Hmmm, the Lewis that beat Ruddock was not dissimilar in style and effect to some of Hearns performances - which is impressive coming from such a big man.
But, I think Hearns had more of those performance, climbing up a number of weight categories, and devoured the greater opposition. When it comes to the crunch Lewis has no answer for Hearns beautiful wins over Cuevas and Duran. |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Contender
ESB Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 659
vCash: 1000 |
Lewis at first thought - He was a greater heavyweight than Hearns was any of his weights.
I don't buy the ridiculous argument that putting on weight automatically makes you better "pound for pound" than fighters who can't move up in weight-class. I view "pound for pound" as "overall" As Muhammad Ali put it, "if Fighter X was a heavyweight, how good would he be?" But I may have to think about this one a little more, both are a long way off the top10 in my book. |
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|