Boxing  

Forum Home Boxing Forum European British Classic Aussie MMA Training
Go Back   Boxing News 24 Forum > Boxing > Classic Boxing Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 08-20-2007, 04:37 PM   #31
JohnThomas1
Undisputed Champion
East Side VIP
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 11,098
vCash: 1000
Default Re: Nelson Vs whitaker

A great big man always beats a great little one they say. That's what happened, as Ezzard alludes to.
JohnThomas1 is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 08-20-2007, 04:43 PM   #32
Robbi
Marvelous
East Side Guru
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 7,549
vCash: 1000
Default Re: Nelson Vs whitaker

Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnThomas1
A great big man always beats a great little one they say. That's what happened, as Ezzard alludes to.
JT. Watch the video clip above, they look the same size. Nelson taller, but overall body mass even. Neck, shoulders, waist, legs, etc.

Just because Nelson was moving up, it makes everyone think that on the night he was the smaller man, when he clearly wasn't. If anyone watched that fight without knowing anything about boxing they would not come to the conclusion Nelson was the "smaller" man.

"A great big man always beats a great little one". Most of the time. But I would not use that phrase for Whitaker beating Nelson.

Nothing to do with being a Whitaker fan, hence the avatar.
Robbi is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2007, 05:06 PM   #33
Mantequilla
Belt holder
ESB Addict
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,484
vCash: 1000
Default Re: Nelson Vs whitaker

Nelson did look strong as hell and perfectly comfortable at the weight against Whitaker.

he was just never in Whitaker's class even at his very best.
Mantequilla is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2007, 05:05 AM   #34
JohnThomas1
Undisputed Champion
East Side VIP
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 11,098
vCash: 1000
Default Re: Nelson Vs whitaker

Quote:
Originally Posted by Robbi
JT. Watch the video clip above, they look the same size. Nelson taller, but overall body mass even. Neck, shoulders, waist, legs, etc.

Just because Nelson was moving up, it makes everyone think that on the night he was the smaller man, when he clearly wasn't. If anyone watched that fight without knowing anything about boxing they would not come to the conclusion Nelson was the "smaller" man.

"A great big man always beats a great little one". Most of the time. But I would not use that phrase for Whitaker beating Nelson.

Nothing to do with being a Whitaker fan, hence the avatar.
You guys both miss the point, Nelson was never a natural lightweight, not at all. Both weighing 135 fight night means nothing in the context of my statement, which has long been boxing lore. Sanchez - Gomez, Gomez - Zarate, Arguello - Pryor, Spinks - Tyson, Charles - Marciano, the list is endless.
JohnThomas1 is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2007, 07:29 AM   #35
JohnThomas1
Undisputed Champion
East Side VIP
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 11,098
vCash: 1000
Default Re: Nelson Vs whitaker

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sweet Pea
Usually that saying applies to stuff like Bowe/Holyfield. It wasn't that they weighed the same in Nelson and Whitaker's case, it was that they were clearly the same size. Would you say Whitaker was bigger than Duran just because Duran started at 118? Watch them fight, they're the same size.
Well you still don't quite follow but i'll leave it at that

JohnThomas1 is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Reply

Boxing News 24 Forum > Boxing > Classic Boxing Forum

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump





All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:08 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Boxing News 24 Forum 2013