|
|
|
#31 |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,518
vCash: 500 |
Hi Combat. That may be so, but it was also easier to HIT by a mile (Quarry not being one tenth the boxer that Moore was). And the consequences for swinging on and missing Archie Moore were twice what they were for swinging on and missing Jerry Quarry. Pinpoint counters to every vulnerable spot on your face and anatomy.
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
|
|
#36 |
|
Champion
East Side Guru
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,700
vCash: 1000 |
JQ may have had a better chin than Moore. However, Hatchetman Sheppard said Archie was the hardest puncher he ever fought, with either hand. (This is significant, because Hatchetman took on Moore and JJW in back to back fights, and took on each twice.) Lowry said Moore was the hardest puncher he ever fought. Only Moore and Walcott were ever able to drop Marciano. It may not be a given that Ron has the greater firepower here. Defense, hand speed and all purpose skill are clearly in the Mongoose's favor. Moore's reach was just an inch less than Lyle's. Ron was first schooled by Young at a time when Jimmy weighed around 200. Peralta was 195 then barely 200 the two times they squared off, getting a draw in the rematch. We've all seen what Jerry did to him. Size alone wouldn't do it for Lyle. Archie beat up and took out bigger heavyweights than Ron.
|
|
|
|
#38 |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: SPAIN(canary islands,tenerife)
Posts: 2,364
vCash: 500 |
and this video? demonstrates ? what? this video doesnīt demonstrate shit
moore never faced chuvalo or frazier . and quarry never faced marciano. the facts are marciano knocked moore out and frazier couldnīt "ko" quarry. tko, not ko.even patterson knocked moore out faster than marciano did. patterson could not ko quarry. and joe frazier would ko moore for sure. chuvalo was very solid, he had granite chin, moore might not ko chuvalo even in dreams, chuvalo might well ko moore. even earnie shavers could not ko quarry. quarry had better chin than moore. Last edited by combatesdeboxeo; 11-08-2010 at 10:50 AM. |
|
|
|
#39 |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: SPAIN(canary islands,tenerife)
Posts: 2,364
vCash: 500 |
i never said it. i said that ron lyle was much better than valdez, and much stronger. if lyle could knock down george foreman more than once , lyle had the power to knock out moore and any rival of moore
Last edited by combatesdeboxeo; 11-08-2010 at 10:55 AM. |
|
|
|
#40 |
|
THROW SOME THUNDAAAH!!!!
East Side Guru
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Washington D.C.
Posts: 5,273
vCash: 75 |
I think Valdes was better than Lyle and achieved more, less consistent but he did fight something like 20 top 10 contenders in his day. Your going to win some, lose some at a pace like that. Backyard win or not, next to Marciano, he's the only fighter to UD Charles at this time without controversy. Ray, Layne, and Walcott's point wins were heavily disputed.
|
|
|
|
#41 | ||||
|
Champion
East Side Guru
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 9,568
vCash: 1000 |
That your claim of Quarry having a "miles better" chin is BS.
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Oh, wait... |
||||
|
|
|
#42 | |||
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: SPAIN(canary islands,tenerife)
Posts: 2,364
vCash: 500 |
not, lyle faced much better guys
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
![]() ![]() ![]() game over |
|||
|
|
|
#43 |
|
ESB Junkie
East Side VIP
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 30,747
vCash: 1000 |
I think Moore wins as he has much better skills but I do think Lyle was a load better than Valdes. who was a terrible fighter/boxer. Lyle has great speed for a big man, not a massive puncher but enough to KO Moore if he lands regularly. Moore does have a somewhat suspect chin and was KO'd plenty of times. Archie obviously has a big skill and ring smarts advantages, which I'd lean in favour of here.
|
|
|
|
#44 | |||
|
Champion
East Side Guru
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 9,568
vCash: 1000 |
Which of them did he beat?
No, it's the CORRECT response when someone else fails to provide something to respond with an argument to in the first place. No, that would the person who says "the facts are.." and then is reduced to posting his own speculation. Which was you. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
![]() You mean this "4 x better chin"? |
|||
|
|
|
#45 | ||
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: SPAIN(canary islands,tenerife)
Posts: 2,364
vCash: 500 |
marvin hagler had better skill than bob foster too but all the forum did pick foster to knock him out,moore had much more skill than marciano too. moore was a lhw not a hw. guys, the weights class are for obvious motives
Quote:
Quote:
Archie moore weighed 188 pound in the hw, lyle 220 pounds of pure muscle,32 pounds difference. and it was his natural weight, he was fast and powerful, he had long reach and he took shots from foreman,shavers,quarry,bugner.... lyle by ko no contest |
||
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|