|
|
|
#62 | |
|
More Speed Than Roy!!!!!
East Side Guru
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 6,687
vCash: 1000 |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#63 | |
|
Team Bergeron
ESB Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,162
vCash: 1000 |
Quote:
That said recession may drop interest rates but it'll also generate unemployment, and put downward pressure on wages, AWA's are currently great because the economy is hunky dory, but they've got a downside and you'll see it when there's downward pressure on wages with more people competing for the same positions. Whether or not it's good for you depends on what you do for a crust, i,e, job security, how strong your position is on the negotiating table (if there are plans for you to go on an AWA), own a business (well recession is generally bad in this case, less people employed and often less money to spend)? |
|
|
|
|
#64 |
|
Gatekeeper
ESB Full Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 336
vCash: 1000 |
Thats exactly right Dekkers and exactly why Howard needs outing. Howards logic is completely nieve especially for someone who ran such a terrible economy as treasurer. The new workplace laws are acceptable provided the economy stays strong. Problem is the economy is as you say cyclic. It is inevitable that the economic cycle will go down. And when unemplyment is high, those workplace relations laws will be disasterous for workers. Howard was given enough rope to hang himself, he got drunk on power, he is over.
|
|
|
|
#65 |
|
Team Bergeron
ESB Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,162
vCash: 1000 |
In fairness though, there is a rationale behind what Howards' doing whether or not people agree with it (trying to make Australias' labour force more competitive with asias' long term, as well as taking pressure of business during the downturn so they'll be there to employ during the upturn).
The ethics of that and whether or not there's any other way, is a whole other can of worms though. |
|
|
|
#69 |
|
Team Bergeron
ESB Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,162
vCash: 1000 |
Muttley's right though, it was a bad political move, he atleast needed a Clinton style knob polishing to close out this election
Last edited by Dekkers; 08-28-2007 at 09:01 PM. |
|
|
|
#70 |
|
Journeyman
ESB Jr Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: I dont know where I am, but I know how fast im going
Posts: 113
vCash: 1000 |
As Dekkers pointed out AWA's were created to make australia more productive and in turn more competitive. This is not just for our trade relation with china but to lessen our national trade deficit with all countries.
AWA's promote upskilling, training and increasing efficiency. However while making us a much stronger workforce they also widen the gap between high and low income earners and make it very difficult for people in low bargaining positions. under the centralised wage fixing system the AFPC is able to nationally control the supply of employment and use the blunt instrument of the minimum wage to control our pay. This can be very useful to control inflation and to minimise the wages sector of GDP. One of the main problems for this centralised system is that everyone always wants a pay rise, and if there is a pay rise below inflation (as there has been for the past few years) then everyone whinges about it. This system also provides pay rises for everyone regardless of wether they deserve it or not. All in all if you want a stronger economy then AWA's are the way to go. However if you want to look after people nationally then awards are the key. btw although the government has an influence, it cannot control interest rates. that is the job of the RBA. the labour government missed a big opportunity in the last election when the liberals stated that they would keep interest rates low. if interest rates are high it basically means our economy is going well and that the RBA is trying to slow it down to control inflation. there are however exceptions to this. |
|
|
|
#71 | |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 4,238
vCash: 75 |
Quote:
First intellegent response on this topic since it started.... BTW i like how people comment on Howards poor treasury skills back in the Fraser days now.....peanuts only mentioned it now because it was written in Howards Biography recently as a comment made by Costello..............Nobody ever mentioned it in the previous 10yrs. |
|
|
|
|
#72 |
|
Gatekeeper
ESB Full Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 336
vCash: 1000 |
Actually Kel, it came up from time to time during the last election. But for some reason the labor leader had in mind that he wanted a positive campaign. It turned out bad and now labor is joining the libs in the America style negative trash campaign. It has been the response in parliament for a couple of years now when Howard has baged on about Labors interest rate history. Howard has remained pretty quiet out of shame when the response has been made. I dont expect Labor to drive this home to hard because as anyone with an understanding of interest rates and economys knows the interests rates of the time are always linked to the rest of the world and the conditions of the time. Labor implemented some tough economic initiatives and the result was painfull for a time, but is the main reason why our economy has run so well for the past ten years. Howard has been lucky for ten years. Its over for him now though, he is gone. Which is great because he is a racist old peice of shyte.
|
|
|
|
#73 | |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 4,238
vCash: 75 |
Quote:
Another vote for Little Johnny i take it |
|
|
|
|
#75 | |
|
Titans Time !!!
East Side Guru
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Bulldogs v Titans 2013 GF
Posts: 8,620
vCash: 2611 |
Quote:
Is this the type of chicks that melts your heart Pecks PS - She was hot |
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|