|
|
|
#31 |
|
Undisputed Champion
East Side VIP
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 12,164
vCash: 75 |
Yeah, Louis was a subtle pressure guy while Marciano's was glaringly obvious. I don't think Louis would be able to do anything approaching his best with Marciano stalking him around.
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
|
|
#33 | |
|
Peaceful Muslim Warrior
ESB Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Manchester England
Posts: 562
vCash: 1000 |
Quote:
"I didn't rape her" "I broke my back" |
|
|
|
|
#34 | |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 4,628
vCash: 1000 |
Quote:
Yup, he's a lieing scum bag, but, in this situation, he happens to be partialy right, he does have a chance against a prime Larry, just it is very high. |
|
|
|
|
#35 | |
|
Peaceful Muslim Warrior
ESB Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Manchester England
Posts: 562
vCash: 1000 |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#36 | |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 4,628
vCash: 1000 |
Quote:
Tyson coming out with bad intentions in the first 4-5 rounds (like usual). Larry keeping away with his great foot work (something he didn't have in their fight), and flicking his jab in Tyson face. Then around the 6th round or so starting to take over landing his cross and uppercuts. Tyson gets cut and swollen and loses his will to fight. In the 12th round does something really stupid and gets a point or two taken away. Then, in the championship rounds Larry reallly starts to pound Tyson. Mike stands his ground, but is only eating leather. The ref stops it. Or Larry wins a ud 15. |
|
|
|
|
#37 |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: May 2007
Location: London
Posts: 2,886
vCash: 1000 |
I know about Louis saying he would have never beaten Marciano but I read somewhere Marciano saying the same thing stating he would never beat a prime Louis. I'll try to look for it.
Also Moore was convinced a prime Charles would have beaten Marciano it's in my sig. |
|
|
|
#38 | |
|
Peaceful Muslim Warrior
ESB Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Manchester England
Posts: 562
vCash: 1000 |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#39 | |
|
P4P King
East Side VIP
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: The Sea of Tranquility
Posts: 22,206
vCash: 1000 |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#40 | |
|
Champion
East Side Guru
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: South of London
Posts: 9,794
vCash: 0 |
Quote:
You rob Tyson of this, you rob him one of the few positive things the man has done for boxing post Spinks... |
|
|
|
|
#41 |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,562
vCash: 1000 |
Tyson meant that in his current condition and state that he could never beat Lewis. The two of them sparred together back around 85' and it was a competitive bout with Tyson beating him up the first half and Lewis coming back the second. A Tyson of 87'/88' would murder Lewis in my opinion, but this has been argued too much already.
|
|
|
|
#42 | |
|
Champion
East Side Guru
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: South of London
Posts: 9,794
vCash: 0 |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#43 | |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
vCash: |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#44 | |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
vCash: |
Quote:
Also, he knew Lewis and other interested parties would try to pressure him into a second fight (as had been agreed) and Tyson didn't want to get beat up again or fool anyone about his chances. I think Lewis did sue Tyson eventually for not agreeing to get beaten up a second time. Business is business, I guess. Always seemed like a silly and bizarre contract anyway, but Tyson was the ultimate cash cow and gravy train for everyone so that explains it. |
|
|
|
|
#45 | |
|
Blockbuster
ESB Addict
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,586
vCash: 1000 |
Quote:
1. Louis 2. Marciano 3. Ali |
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|