Big Daddy Dan's Choi Thread

[TFFP]

Thats ace footage to be fair because you have like 10 random people looking at it. So we can rule it out as a photoshop. We either have some unusual craft that they're not telling us about or its ALIENS

[ScubaSteve]

Originally Posted by TFFP

Thats ace footage to be fair because you have like 10 random people looking at it. So we can rule it out as a photoshop. We either have some unusual craft that they're not telling us about or its ALIENS

Are you feeling OK, T?

[icemax]

Originally Posted by TFFP

Thats ace footage to be fair because you have like 10 random people looking at it. So we can rule it out as a photoshop. We either have some unusual craft that they're not telling us about or its ALIENS

I'm convinced by that film...they must have truly gigantic sheds

[Grant1]

Originally Posted by ScubaSteve

Are you feeling OK, T?

He's a bit Flint-like isn't he !!

[ScubaSteve]

Originally Posted by icemax

I'm convinced by that film...they must have truly gigantic sheds

[GazOC]

Originally Posted by TFFP

Have they focused Hubble on the moon to try and find the buggy and space boots then? Cos no disrespect but if your amateur concoction can resolve details a mile across I'd expect the Hubble telescope to be be able to find the buggy and space boots. Hell I'd expect to be able to read the size of the boots.

How come we could go to the moon in 1969 but today we're struggling to get up there again. We should have progressed to Mars by now if we really went to the Moon in 1969 but we're still arsing around on earth. Nobody has been anywhere except the Space station in that time.

Hubble is a pretty small telescope in the greater scheme of things and the size of objects that a telescope can resolve is a function of its size. The current biggest class of telescopes are around 10 meters wide(Hubble is about 2.5 meters), even in ideal conditions you'd need a 200 meter telescope to see a 4 meter long flag nearly 400,000 kilometers away.

Think about the size of the flag and the distances we are talking about......you really expect to be able see that level of detail??

The reason "we" got to the Moon in the 1960s but are struggling to do it now is that there was the Cold War on and there was massive political will to win the "Space Race" and huge amounts of money thrown at the problem. Thats not the case these days.

[TFFP]

By the same token it should be a piece of piss to get to the moon today with our super technologies. I don't think we've progressed that much because we thought 'fuck it if we can fake it why bother'. It doesn't sit that well with me that in over 40 years we havn't gone again for some weird reason...yet we're fucking around on Space Stations and sending all manner of robots across the galaxy.

I bet we'll film our 'Mars Landing' in the Sahara in 2015.

[TFFP]

Do you lads not think thats a good video then? Whats your explanation? It's a UFO, by definition.

[icemax]

Originally Posted by GazOC

Hubble is a pretty small telescope in the greater scheme of things and the size of objects that a telescope can resolve is a function of its size. The current biggest class of telescopes are around 10 meters wide(Hubble is about 2.5 meters), even in ideal conditions you'd need a 200 meter telescope to see a 4 meter long flag nearly 400,000 kilometers away.

Think about the size of the flag and the distances we are talking about......you really expect to be able see that level of detail??

The reason "we" got to the Moon in the 1960s but are struggling to do it now is that there was the Cold War on and there was massive political will to win the "Space Race" and huge amounts of money thrown at the problem. Thats not the case these days.

Thats all very well Gaz but because I don't understand 85% of that then you are just plain wrong by default . Instead of pissing around the margins with your fancy science talk why don't you just explain the fucking film that Viking Boy posted, how do you explain that then?, smart arse.

[GazOC]

We havn't got "super technologies" where space flight is concerned the problem and how we tackle it hasn't changed in 60 years. You explode a load of chemicals under the weight you want to send into space....when you want to send men instead of probes the cost goes through the roof (no pun intended).

Before the program got cancelled during the economic downturn a few years back, NASA had designed the next generation of rockets and modules to go back to the Moon. In terms for what they could do and how they did it they were pretty much the same specs as the Apollo kit used in the 1960s because mechanically the problem is the same and how we have to tackle it is the same.

[TFFP]

Fair enough GodOC, you are putting forward some sound explanations here. I'm being educated.

You're saying theres a gap in the market for anti-gravity generators too.

I'm still not convinced until I see video from the moon in full HD on YouTube. That grainy ass video they concocted leaves me in doubt.

[TFFP]

GodOC, do you not think that video is posted is strange? It seems to me they've got a bit more technology than we are aware of. It's not a weather balloon, nor is it 'Swamp Gas' or whatever else they like to come out with.

If they've got flying orbs that move at that kind of speed we should be getting to the moon, really.

Unless its the Greys.

Whats your scientific theory on it pal?

[GazOC]

I'm in work with no YouTube mate, i'll take a peek later tonight.

[NO MAS]

I read that Derry Matthews is fighting Gavin Reess in Cardiff in July...

What is the date and venue that Barker is fighting Martinez...

[WalletInspector]

Originally Posted by NO MAS

What is the date and venue that Barker is fighting Martinez...

Don't think the deal is 100% completed yet but it was meant to be October 1st somewhere in the states.