|
|
|
#1 |
|
Undisputed Champion
East Side VIP
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: London,England
Posts: 10,638
vCash: 1000 |
Still baffled as to how Hagler only got a draw out of this one. Granted he took his foot off the gas in the latter stages and Vito came on strong,yet surely Marvin had built up a comfortable points cushion to take it.
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Contender
ESB Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,040
vCash: 1000 |
I had it 8-7 for Hagler, so I didn't have a real problem with the draw decision. The writer for the Associated Press scored it 143-142 for Antuofermo, so the controversy continues. I wonder how the magazines scored it at the time, like Ring or Boxing Illustrated?
Scartissue |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Sizzle
ESB Addict
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Ball So Hard University
Posts: 2,336
vCash: 1000 |
Antoufermo/Hagler
Round 1: 9-10 Round 2: 9-10 Round 3: 9-10 Round 4: 9-10 Round 5: 9-10 Round 6: 10-10 Round 7: 10-9 Round 8: 10-9 Round 9: 10-10 Round 10: 9-10 Round 11: 9-10 Round 12: 9-10 Round 13: 10-9 Round 14: 10-9 Round 15: 10-9 142-145 Hagler |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Champion
East Side Guru
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: South of London
Posts: 9,794
vCash: 0 |
Hagler was too cautious late on, and back then (rightly IMO) any benefit of the doubt went to the champion.
Hagler could bitch, but the draw (for the time) was a fair result. |
|
|
|
#9 |
|
P4P King
East Side VIP
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 21,600
vCash: 1000 |
Very poor verdict. Hagler was cautious because he thought he had the fight in the bag. Maybe he shouldn't have been, but his margin should have been wide enough to win the title. Judges can't just cross their scoring out from the earlier rounds because late on in the fight if they think "hmm, maybe he hasn't done enough to take the title away". Even if they thought that in the final few rounds, their cards should have still had Marvin in a big enough lead when he did fight like he was 'taking' the title.
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Undisputed Champion
East Side VIP
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 13,945
vCash: 1000 |
To me Hagler just didn't act like he wanted the Championship.......where Vito, as limited as he was in skill, very much wanted to continue to be champion.
I was disappointed that Hagler didn't win, but I was not surprised at the result back when I saw it live on TV. |
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Champion
East Side Guru
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: South of London
Posts: 9,794
vCash: 0 |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 3,457
vCash: 300 |
I had Hagler by maybe two/three rounds.
Vito had great conditioning/workrate and Marvin took his foot off the gas and it cost him. Vito did not give Marvin any room to move and fought well in the trenches, Marvin did not use the angles in this bout that he could/should of and the rematch shows this, athough Marvin looked alot hungryer after this bout and maybe we are all better off from the draw that he received. |
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: liftin 3 kettlebells in pa.usa
Posts: 2,172
vCash: 1000 |
Quote:
So what if Vito became more aggressive and Hagler boxed more,he was still beating the crap out of Vito. |
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|