|
|
|
#1 |
|
Contender
ESB Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 782
vCash: 1008 |
Obviously no.1 is all Wilfredo Gomez but...
no.2 spot is interesting because its pretty much a H2H between Erik Morales vs Jeff Fenech. Morales was a beast at 122lbs, he beats junior jones, MAB and a few other good but not great fighter. Fenech had a shorter stint there, but beat Zaragoza and Zarate. Despite's Fenech's power, i don't see him knocking out Morales. Morales would take some rounds, but fenech's workrate i think overcomes El terrible's one. I think Fenech is no.2 Morales 3 |
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
MAB.
East Side VIP
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: UK, England
Posts: 21,013
vCash: 842 |
Quote:
I give it to Morales. He beat a peak Barrera, a good version of Junior Jones, and beat a past prime Zaragoza despite being relatively inexperienced. |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Undisputed Champion
East Side VIP
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Sydney
Posts: 11,619
vCash: 166 |
Fenech would beat Morales..but I think its fair to say that Erik has him for resume at the weight.
Zarate was past it..Payakaron was a little more promise then substance at that stage plus had partied himself into poor fitness leading up until that fight. Richardson was a bantam. Zaragoza was arguably pre-prime in a technical sense against Fenech..I think all things considered Morales and Jeff faced versions of Zaragoza almost on par. Dan was definitely physically better when he fought Fenech, faster and had better stamina. But the Zaragoza that fought Morales was more well rounded and wiley, he looked like he had developed his style to the best of his ability deal with his shortcomings like his age and lack of pop. Overall Morales had the better names and unified...that more then makes up for the fairly small gulf I have between them in H2H ability. |
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|