|
|
|
#2 |
|
Journeyman
ESB Jr Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 277
vCash: 1000 |
I say Hagler takes this one as well...Much as I love Tommy-one of my alltime favourites...his only chance against a charging-pressure Hagler was a killer right hand that could drop Marvin...Other than that,Hagler was gonna get to him sooner or later.We know Hagler could KO him MW,and I don't see any reason he can't do it at LHW.
But,like the original,it would be great while it lasted.I'd be rooting for Tommy to be sure..but I don't think he could have beaten Marvin. |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Contender
ESB Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 531
vCash: 500 |
i agree, at lhw hagler would have been a fat midget, he was a small mw, at 175 he would have been much more slow with less stamina, tommy was longer and he could carry this weight better, he would outpoint hagler,
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
P4P King
East Side VIP
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Dallas,Texas.
Posts: 18,277
vCash: 1010 |
Tommy stops Marvin on a TKO in about 7. Hagler/Hearns was an interesting fight. They had no trouble hitting each other. I think it always ends in a knockout of some sort. And I think the rematch might have favored Tommy by TKO even at middleweight. If he just slowed the fight down and picked Marvin apart and dropped in the right hand occasionally, but not go for the knockout. Pretty much use the jab to well up Marvin's face and eventually he would get cut or swelled up and let the ref stop it. I know Tommy could have beaten Marvin. That first fight even though Tommy lost, he hit him clean and easily.
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
P4P King
East Side VIP
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Dallas,Texas.
Posts: 18,277
vCash: 1010 |
Quote:
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|