Forum Home Boxing Forum European British Classic Twitter MMA Facebook Training
Go Back   Boxing News 24 Forum > Boxing > General Boxing Forum

Closed Thread
Thread Tools
Old 09-15-2007, 08:17 AM   #136
Boro chris
East Side Guru
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: I'm not Jesus Christ. I've come to accept that now.
Posts: 5,140
vCash: 1000
Default Re: Why is Calzaghe's opposition considered trash?

Originally Posted by Toopretty
His best opponent to date was Jeff Lacy...Robin Reid and was average no matter what you UK posters say. All of the European fighters he fought mainly were very extra average fighters and those are the better ones. Eubank was on his way out and gave Calzaghe a run. He is a great fighter but there is no defending his **** resume in which you cant even mention Roy's resume in the same breath as Calzaghe...Roy took on tougher guys in the 90s alone Then Calzaghe did his whole entire career.
Lacy was not as good as a faded Eubank imo. And JC was a complete novice when he took Chris on.
And Robin Reid was not 'average' no matter what you septics say!
Boro chris is offline  Top
Old 09-15-2007, 08:23 AM   #137
Max Molyneux
Liverpool Liver Tickler
ESB Addict
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: England
Posts: 2,981
vCash: 1241
Default Re: Why is Calzaghe's opposition considered trash?

Originally Posted by Quik
He fought good oposition. I was taking it to beat kessler until kessler schooled andrade. Now i consider kessler have fought better oposition than calzaghe.
Andrade has never beaten a top 10 fighter.
Max Molyneux is offline  Top
Old 09-15-2007, 08:25 AM   #138
Juan Manuel Marquez
ESB Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 895
vCash: 1000
Default Re: Why is Calzaghe's opposition considered trash?

Couse it's trash
pioterbezkitu is offline  Top
Sponsored Links

Old 09-15-2007, 08:48 AM   #139
ESB Addict
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,109
vCash: 563
Default Re: Why is Calzaghe's opposition considered trash?

Starie was class, just see what he did to a current LHW titlist for evidence.

People were really talking Starie up back then.
China_hand_Joe is offline  Top
Old 09-18-2007, 07:22 PM   #140
Winston Zedmore
East Side Guru
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Newport Essex innit
Posts: 5,844
vCash: 75
Default Re: Why is Calzaghe's opposition considered trash?

A talent like JC will not be fully appreciated until he is long gone out of the sport. Having said that, Joe is his own worst enemy. He's got a reputation within the sport by pulling out of one of the fights with Glen Johnson without a valid reason and almost bailing in the Lacy fight. He should have forced ******'s hand earlier to get decent opposition but Joe has been content plodding along. The biggest disappointment for me is that we will never truely know just how great Joe Calzaghe was. He had all the talent in the world to be competetive with, and I believe, had at least a 50/50 chance against ANYBODY from 160-175 during the past 10 years.

He's beat some solid opposition, a lot of boxers who are unheralded but very useful: punchers, counter punchers, bangers, brawlers, technical boxers.. Has he been pushed enough? No. Has he fought some embarrasing bums? Yes. Is his opposition any worse than RJJ? Slightly, but not much. Is it possible that in his mid 30's he's still better than anyone else in and around his division even though he should be past his prime? We'll find out 3rd November - for many, a convincing win will only make it harder to accept the frustration that he never fought a prime RJJ, Ottke, BHop et al.

I've enjoyed following his career, he's exciting and exceptional. To me, he has nothing to prove - the entertainment value and skills of Joe Calzaghe in the ring, once you get him there, are second to none. Enjoy him while he's around, because I reckon we've only got about an hour's worth of this great talent left in a boxing ring.
PrideOfWales is offline  Top
Old 09-18-2007, 08:08 PM   #141
ESB Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: God loves Dire Straits
Posts: 618
vCash: 1000
Default Re: Why is Calzaghe's opposition considered trash?

Originally Posted by Blocky
Calzaghe's opposition is average. It's not great, it's not bad, it's average.

He's fought proven elite fighters like Eubank.
He's fought solid contenders like Reid and Woodhall
He's fought awkward fighters like Salem and Bika
He's fought up and coming fighters like Lacy, Veit and a young Sheika
He's fought decent, top ten rated fighters like Mkertchian, Mitchell, Brewer

Lacy and Eubank are the only "named" fighters he's fought, sure - but he's in the SMW division - a division that has had two fatal flaws in the time that Calzaghe has been around

Flaw 1: It has been bereft of 'big name' fighters largely due to the legacy of fighters directly above and directly below. Fighters weren't getting past Hopkins at Middleweight and Fighters saw more money with Jones Jr at LHW - SMW was not a glamour division and as such, did not attract glamour (read, American known) fighters during Calzaghe's time period.

Calzaghe, being committed to defending his belt and wanting to establish himself as the greatest in his weight class never looked at going down in weight or up in weight - however he did put his feelers out for a Bernard Hopkins fight in 2002 that was all but signed until Hopkins demanded double money.

Flaw 2: Sven Ottke would not fight Joe Calzaghe. Ottke during his time was the only other fighter who a spotless record who held a title belt . (Despite Ottke having lost at least four fights in my eyes).

The SMW division had a bunch of talent that except for Calzaghe, were not standing tall above one another - people were trading wins and losses and until Lacy and now Kessler, no one really rised above the competition as a solid threat and contender to Calzaghe.

Excepting Ottke - the only two "dominant" fighters at SMW outside of Joe Calzaghe, were Jeff Lacy and now Mikkel Kessler

Both who he has/will be fighting and both he he has/will beat.

People can ***** and moan all they want about "Why didn't Joe go down to 160 or up to 175" - the fact is, he didn't - he has however fought the best available fighters in his division, a division he has cleared out and is about to clear out once more.
sjc is offline  Top
Old 01-07-2016, 09:48 AM   #142
ESB Senior Member
Join Date: May 2015
Location: In my head
Posts: 563
vCash: 500
Default Re: Why is Calzaghe's opposition considered trash?

Originally Posted by Amsterdam View Post
Hopkins is too old, that would be worthlles.

Beating Kessler, the Taylor/Pavlik winner and Dawson ends all questions, especially if they DOMINATIVE victories. How a fight is won counts for a lot.

For example, dominating Kessler and Dawson ought to be considered way better than a come from behind KO over Nunn, which is one of Toney's biggest wins.

Plus, losing to Taylor is pretty sour in my opinion, but again, he's old, Calzaghe would stop him at this point and would recieve no credit.
To think what B-Hop would accomplish the decade after.
RC31 is offline  Top
Closed Thread

Boxing News 24 Forum > Boxing > General Boxing Forum

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:55 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Boxing News 24 Forum 2015