|
|
||||||||
|
| View Poll Results: Well? | |||
| Gerald McClellan |
|
16 | 59.26% |
| Thomas Hearns |
|
11 | 40.74% |
| Voters: 27. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#4 |
|
Journeyman
ESB Jr Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Devon, UK
Posts: 130
vCash: 1000 |
Can't see Tommy's chin holding up against the always-dangerous McClellan, who I might add is P4P one of the hardest hitters of the last 20 years...
McClellan is also proven against monster punchers - Jackson and Benn (I know he lost against Benn but IMO that fight showed that he can indeed stand up to big punchers). I can't see him being to fazed by the power of Hearns, unless of course Hearns lands a massive bomb, ala Duran, which I can't see happening. G-Man KO6 Hitman |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
vCash: |
Their not even on the same class .
The "Gman" won a vacant title and had two significant wins on guys with hand picked tomatoes on their records. Julian jackson(?) John Mugabi(?) and the rest were top line bums. Hearns had few of those but his 8 fight winning streak before Marvin Hagler out weighs any thing McClellan has done. McClellan was to aggressive for his own good, i can see Hearns using his ring movement to tire McClellan and catch him with the straight right from the ropes. he doesn't have the dynamite to put Hearns away.
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Journeyman
ESB Jr Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Devon, UK
Posts: 130
vCash: 1000 |
I disagree to be honest. On his day, I think McClellan had the firepower and arsenal to put ANYONE away in or around his weight class.
I also can't see Hearns KO'ing McClellan either, outside of an amazingly well-timed and powerful right hand to the unsuspecting chin of the G-Man. |
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Champion
East Side Guru
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 7,371
vCash: 1000 |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Undisputed Champion
East Side VIP
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: in a boxing gym near you
Posts: 10,498
vCash: 1000 |
Yeah really. McClellan was one of the biggest punching middleweights ever. He would have a chance against anyone. I would love to get Emanuel Stewards take on this fight, but Im sure he would go with Hearns. I would say Hearns could outbox him but Gerald could catch him and ko him. Hearns would fight back and Gerald would bring it, tough pick for me.
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
ヒップホップ·プロデューサー
East Side VIP
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: 黒人文化の恋人のサンプリ
Posts: 18,789
vCash: 1500 |
g is MUCH bigger. hearns is a tall lanky guy but McClellan was a boiled down cruiser. he is the bigger man. i cant see him getting outmuscled or on th eend of a jab becuase hearns even though a very VERY good fighter but against a solid puncher with a long reach and a iron chin also willing to step foreward. it would be a ticking time bomb before g man hits.
also he had a decent enough boxing abilty to not look totally at sea. if a 5'8 street fighting roldan almost got rid of hearns then somone with a bit of class ability and chin shoudl be able to catch hearns enough to get the stoppage. |
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Champion
East Side Guru
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,961
vCash: 3950 |
weird thing is , that of all possible past fighters , hearns is the one who is being remembered as he really was here.
i can't find many more examples - maybe dempsey too , simply he is somewhat being skipped in the classic forum lately (at least) for some reason. |
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Gatekeeper
ESB Full Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 302
vCash: 1000 |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Comical Ali-egedly
East Side VIP
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: trying to increase my overdraft....
Posts: 35,251
vCash: 75 |
Hearns UD, or late stoppage.
The chin issue is seriously overrated. Granted, he wasn't granite jawed, but he wasn't structured like a sandcastle either. |
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|