the what fights did you watch today\scorecard thread.

[Flea Man]

Originally Posted by salsanchezfan

Re-scored the Villasana-Esparragoza match yet? You'd mentioned you were in the minority on that one, and anxious to see if you saw it any differently. It's one of those one could just as easily see it one way of the other depending on the style you tend to notice. I thought the draw was spot on.

I need to I do think it's because Esparragoza's flashier output earlier on swayed me....that's not something that I tend to get caught up in though so who knows, maybe I'll score it the same way again

[AlFrancis]

Originally Posted by frankenfrank

r u not 1 of those claiming that d "intermediate" divisions r redundant ?

so now your claim is that 118 was 2 high 4 him but 122 (as opposed 2 126)
was 2 high ?

is not d definition of superbantamweight , d lowest division where those having 2 much trouble of making 118 belong ?

u ignored my comparison with d much bigger Espinosa .


possible , but usually those having trouble of making a certain weight have more trouble of making it when more time passes .


a bit possible , but that was already in d "initial" 3 lbs difference between them .


I doubt it , but it is possible .



as implied by your posts , they had more than 3 lbs separating between them as early as then .

As time passes , differences due 2 differences in lifestyles might increase , but back then i doubt that d difference between them was more than 3 lbs .


again , r u trying 2 imply that there should b a division between 118 and 122 ?

If he was such a huge 118 (of course that he was not since his identical twin reigned during d exact same time @ 115 and his opponent Luisito Espinosa whom really was a big 118 and later a successful 126 was not claimed 2b more drained at 118 here) , would not he fit 122 just exactly ?


Because of all d text i typed in this and my previous posts on this subject .

No Frank, I'm not suggesting there should be a weight class between bantam and super bantam. Seems to me that you're the one who's not getting it.

[Flea Man]

Window licker

[frankenfrank]

big cock does not imply homosoxuality .

small cock might help 2 get 2 window licking .

after all some organ needs 2 help excrete them strong urges .

and most of us know which size u own

[Flea Man]

What country are you from? Post on a board with your own language please, everything you say is nonsensical and makes me wish you were dead.

[frankenfrank]

Originally Posted by AlFrancis

No Frank, I'm not suggesting there should be a weight class between bantam and super bantam. Seems to me that you're the one who's not getting it.

u implied that Khaokor was 2 big 4 118 (since he was visibly not fat) , yet 2 small 4 122 , and that despite my 2 comparisons with his reigning identical twin at 115 and his opponent both at d same time he was supposedly drained .

i also never claimed that i was sure that he was not drained , just that even drained fighters do not collapse as soon as d 1st rd without even getting hit .

[frankenfrank]

delit

[Nightcrawler]

FRIDAY MOTHERFUCKERS! In honour of my first friday as a married man, I let the wife nap so I could watch some boxing

First up, Martinez vs Pavlik. I hadn't sat through that whole fight yet and damn it was pretty good. I wanted to gear up for this Saturday (anyone in Canada on the weekend, swing by my place) and this showed Martinez with all his brilliance...and all his flaws.

Rounds 1-4 were all sergio. Brilliant movement, straight lefts, stinging jabs. Just a master of distance...

Rounds 5-8 ...until Pavlik started to time him. Pavlik landed thudding jabs and tremendous right hands to the body. Seriously he adapted, which is something i thought him COMPLETELY incapable of doing. Looked like a grinding Pavlik victory until...

Rounds 9-12 ...Sergio digs deep and finds two massive balls. And a cut on Pavlik's face. Either way Sergio starts sitting on his punches, while maintaining elusiveness and basically destroys Pavlik. Seriously, I almost scored the 9th round 10-8. Just kicked the shit out of Kelly to win the title.

By the way, between this and Williams 2 I learned that HBO just fucking hated Maravilla. Their commentary was horseshit and one sided

[LittleRed]

I can't tell youhow to live your life but assuming HBO commentary will always be biased against the fighter with less marquee value is a safe bet. Also congratulations.

[Nightcrawler]

Originally Posted by LittleRed

I can't tell youhow to live your life but assuming HBO commentary will always be biased against the fighter with less marquee value is a safe bet. Also congratulations.

thanks and it sucks cause i've spent years defending the commentary and i'm noticing how fucking terrible it is recently

[Flea Man]

Congrats mate Your life is over

[Lester1583]

What the hell?

Why fearless Ursua fought so timidly against feather fisted Tomori?!

Pretty sure Ursua was shocked to the core when he saw what his punches did to Zapata.
That fight changed Ursua forever.

There's no other logical explanation.

[Nightcrawler]

Originally Posted by Flea Man

Congrats mate Your life is over

thanks flea and you sound like most of my buddies....guess the handjobs and surprising me with beer are over

[frankenfrank]

Originally Posted by Nightcrawler

thanks flea and you sound like most of my buddies....guess the handjobs and surprising me with beer are over

these r very very very very wrong reasons 4 marriage .

Did u ever think Y no man who insists on pre marriage property contract ever gets married ?

U know Y them hoes want it , not 4d cock , they have plenty of it without d marriage .

Let me make it simpler 4u : did u ever think Y no man who has no job/money ever gets married ?

I guess u know d answer .

I believe that paying directly 4 sex (which i still have not done) is more justifiable and correct than marriage .

In our world and time , marriage is good almost exclusively 4d hos , and i do know about d average life expectancy advantage of married men .

.. and also have n explanation 4 it : they r richer .

so there u go .

[Nightcrawler]

Originally Posted by frankenfrank

these r very very very very wrong reasons 4 marriage .

Did u ever think Y no man who insists on pre marriage property contract ever gets married ?

U know Y them hoes want it , not 4d cock , they have plenty of it without d marriage .

Let me make it simpler 4u : did u ever think Y no man who has no job/money ever gets married ?

I guess u know d answer .

I believe that paying directly 4 sex (which i still have not done) is more justifiable and correct than marriage .

In our world and time , marriage is good almost exclusively 4d hos , and i do know about d average life expectancy advantage of married men .

.. and also have n explanation 4 it : they r richer .

so there u go .

frank, i may not agree with you but you have put a lot of thought into that. it's a pretty damn good argument