|
|
|
#2896 |
|
Champion
East Side Guru
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: The dirty dirty.
Posts: 5,369
vCash: 500 |
The middle rounds were actually quite close. Great beginning and ending for Sanchez, but the fight isn't the schooling throughout that it's often made to be.
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
|
|
#2898 |
|
Champion
East Side Guru
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: The dirty dirty.
Posts: 5,369
vCash: 500 |
True. Dropped in the first and stunned two more times before the end of the third. Yum wasn't a puncher, either, even though he was made to look like a go-for-broke bomber by Gomez. From the 4th round on that fight is a one-sided masterpiece.
|
|
|
|
#2899 | |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Canada!!!!
Posts: 2,215
vCash: 500 |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#2901 |
|
Fighting Zapata
ESB Addict
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 4,457
vCash: 500 |
The way Gomez crumbled early under Sanchez' punches(and sal was a straight accumulation guy with a flattering stoppage record imo) spoke badly for his punch resistance.
Fight was basically over after that, even though he showed massive balls to battle away for a while and make Sanchez work for it. |
|
|
|
#2902 | |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Canada!!!!
Posts: 2,215
vCash: 500 |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#2903 |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Canada!!!!
Posts: 2,215
vCash: 500 |
the problem with gomez at that time is that he seemed, to me anyway, to use his boxing skills only to set up the knockout. when he didn't come, and wouldn't come, against sanchez he ran out of options
|
|
|
|
#2904 |
|
MAB.
East Side VIP
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: UK, England
Posts: 21,013
vCash: 842 |
I just watched Olivares-Castillo I. I didn't keep a scorecard, but I got the sense the fight was well won by Olivares who was landing his left hand without too much trouble, and landed some really nice looking 2's and 3's throughout the 15 too. Castillo looked to box on the back foot, countering, but he wasn't doing that good of a job at it. Well beaten in the end.
|
|
|
|
#2905 | |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,745
vCash: 1000 |
Quote:
I think Sanchez would always beat Gomez at featherwieght but that should have been a more competitive fight than it was. Gomez show a lot of heart and was competitive for several rounds, but I never had the feeling the outcome was in doubt after the first round. |
|
|
|
|
#2906 | |
|
มวยสากล
East Side VIP
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: @ferociousflea
Posts: 39,824
vCash: 75 |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#2907 |
|
MAB.
East Side VIP
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: UK, England
Posts: 21,013
vCash: 842 |
What would we be saying about Olivares had he seen out the fight with Arguello? Quite an achievement for a former Bantamweight to perform that well against Arguello at 126lbs.
|
|
|
|
#2908 | |
|
มวยสากล
East Side VIP
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: @ferociousflea
Posts: 39,824
vCash: 75 |
Quote:
One thing's for sure, Olivares pretty much laid down the blueprint to beat Arguello, and like him, many others failed to keep the movement going and stay out of range. The Marcel fight taught Alexis a lot it seems, but the Olivares fight is the first piece of footage we have of Arguello really finding his style. Considering what he'd already been through, I'd say it's already a pretty solid achievement for Olivares, putting on a performance like that. Especially considering how rotten he would go on to look when he fought Pedroza. Yuck. |
|
|
|
|
#2910 | |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,745
vCash: 1000 |
Quote:
I've also been reviewing some prime Gomez fights (thanks to Flea). I think Sanchez would always beat Gomez at 126. But I've been wondering if Sanchez was a better Featherweight than Gomez was a Super Bantamweight. I'm not talking resume, just pure abillity. I've noticed something watching them side by side. Gomez is spectacular with the angles he creates with footwork and sliding to put himself in punching range while getting his opponent out of punching range. He also incorporates incredible head movement when doing this. It's ****ing spectacular to watch. And he was a nasty ****er so I wondered if he was just punking guys because he could. But I see it in all of his prime fights and it appears to be his style. Well, long story short, I think that Sanchez is more efficient with his movements. Gomez can make a guy look silly and make him miss by several inches. Sanchez will make a guy miss by just an inch or just enough so that a landed blow is not nearly flush. At the very highest levels (like against each other), Sanchez's stuff works better. Gomez at times reminds me a bit of Duran. But like Sanchez, I think Duran is less flashy but more efficient than Gomez. Gomez also reminds me a bit of O.Canizales. And I've often wondered the same thing. Would Canizales stuff work against the very top flight competition? We never got to find that out. Gomez also gets a little lazy with the jab. He paws it out there often as a range finder for the right hand. I wonder if a tall puncher like an Eirk Morales could make him pay for that? Anyway, I still think he's the best 122 lber I've ever seen. |
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|