|
|
|
#1 |
|
Undisputed Champion
East Side VIP
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Lisboa, Portugal
Posts: 10,060
vCash: 1000 |
Zale missed a great portion of his prime to war service so perhaps you need to extrapolate a bit here. But both were noted for a certain attribute.
I think you know where I'm going here. |
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
RIP Mr. Bun: 2007-2012
ESB Addict
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,007
vCash: 1000 |
Zale was one tough cookie but I like the bodysnatcher big here. McCallum is very underrated I believe while the "Man of Steel" is a little overrated.
McCallum KO 11 Zale |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
P4P King
East Side VIP
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: The Sea of Tranquility
Posts: 22,149
vCash: 1000 |
Zales was typical of guys from his era..they were tougher and harder than anyone McCallum ever fought in general...although I liked Mike, he would he would be manhandled by an even better body snatcher than himself..a late round tko for Zale.
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
ESB Junkie
East Side VIP
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 30,707
vCash: 1000 |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: May 2007
Location: London
Posts: 2,885
vCash: 1000 |
I think McCallum would outbox Zale and win a decision by a fair margin. Be interesting who has the better on the inside these two are some of the best body punches the sport has seen.
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Undisputed Champion
East Side VIP
Join Date: May 2009
Location: out preaching for the church of benn
Posts: 10,081
vCash: 1054 |
McCallum by decision but he would have to use his boxing skills if he gets into a war with zale he may find himself in trouble late in the fight
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|