Told ya Taylor was a F-R-A-U-D! - Page 4

paulfv · 09-30-2007, 03:08 AM

I cannot believe on the main board people who picked Taylor to win are trying to convince themselves Taylor would win a rematch and/or this is going to be a trilogy. What a joke!

People, the only thing different if these two fight again is that Pavlik doesn't showboat and drop his hands in the 2nd round, and doesn't get dropped. Pavlik will still KO/TKO Taylor, and just as brutally.

I cannot be clear enough about this: There is NO, ZERO version of Taylor that can defeat Pavlik in the pros. This isn't the amateurs, and Taylor does not have the tools to beat Pavlik. PERIOD.

Taylor is exactly what I said he was -- a FRAUD. He's great against old guys and undersized guys. As soon as he went against a guy who was under 35 and had the offense to back him up (and who wasn't a Jr. Middle), he was going to lose. It could have been Pavlik, it could have been someone else. This is what Jermaine Taylor is -- good not great, right guy at the right time and place to 'hold' the belt for a real champ like a Pavlik.

I can't believe how easy Taylor is to hit. Ridiculous.

Fruad, back to ARK you go. Thank you, Ghost, for ending the joke played on fans by DiBella and HBO.

brooklyn1550 · 09-30-2007, 03:09 AM

This truly was a "throwback" fight...like the days of Graziano, Zale, Basilio, etc...

Farmboxer · 09-30-2007, 03:19 AM

Pavlik can be proud of himself, damned good fight tonight, exciting for a change.

I had Hopkins beating Taylor both times, and I had Winky beating Taylor, also, the fix in was in for Taylor tonight with the damned biased judges, but Pavlik stopped him, good thing, the judges had made up their minds before the fight. I take nothing away from Pavlik, he won the fight against the judges will. And ESPN? They should be ashamed of themselves. Max Kellerman said on ESPN FNF that he would never recognize the WBO title as long as a Klitschko had the title, that says it all.

MrStayman · 09-30-2007, 03:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Haggis McJackass

Oh, I'm sorry, I just realized that Taylor is a black guy while Pavlik is white. Since, as you know, I am a white man, I am duty-bound to not disrespect my race and its proud history of fucking everyone up.

Forget everything you read there. Fuck Taylor, that ignorant-assed, fried-chicken-smelling, gospel-record-listening, stupid-stagger-walking, low-pants-wearing, low-ride-rolling, tacky-jewelery-wearing n****r.

There, that's better. Almost approved of a black man's actions and came to his defence against bullshit criticism there. Wouldn't want you to think any of us are actually capable of doing that, would we? Never mind, the white guy won, so I'm happy.

Fuck Jermaine Taylor, his skin is too dark.

Someone is going to not realize this is sarcasm

paulfv · 09-30-2007, 03:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by donkeyrigged

Max Kellerman sucks more black cawk than Kim Kardashian. He's a fuggin joke.

Brilliant post, d.r. Seriously, this is post of the year material.

Kellerman sucks. He is garbage.

sues2nd · 09-30-2007, 03:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Toopretty

TELL THESE DUMB ESB WHORES.......TAYLOR FOUGHT HIS ASS OFF STANDING FUCKING OVATION FOR TWO FUCKING PRIZE FIGHTERS WITH MORE HEART THEN THESE DUMB BITCHES.

Great post....

boxbox · 09-30-2007, 03:35 AM

Sure he is! so now you can't say Pavlik is good right? any average fighter can beat a fraud imo. And Pavlik almost got ko'd by the fraud... Please, dont take this away from Kelly, he beat a good fighter to say the least!

teekay00 · 09-30-2007, 03:55 AM

he did lose tonight but he is not a FRAUD. He put Pavlik down and im sure a lot of people thought that was the end of the fight, that would have kept a lot of guys down, not pavlik tho, he got a good heart. Pavlik is a good fighter who has not lost to ANYONE yet ok. Now if he would have been some weaksauce guy with weak losses then you can say Taylor is a fraud but he lost to a very good fighter tonight.

Vantage_West · 09-30-2007, 03:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Toopretty

He Is A Fraud For Losing A Close Fight By Knockout Almost Blasting Pavliks Ass Out On His Feet In The 2nd..you Dumb Shits....the Fuck Crack Are You Haters Smoking.

exactly i dont see why a rematch isnt imposed?

alex-boxer42 · 09-30-2007, 04:03 AM

^what?

Anyway first of all much to respect to both fighters for putting on a brave and exciting performance and actually giving us our moneys worth.

Taylor was a fraud, but it wasnt his fault. It was the fault of the bs judging and whatever connections HBO had to make him out as a star before he really earned it himself. This made him think he was on top the world before he really did anything decisive. I mean, one could make an argument he lost all five of his previous fights.

Tonight he did what true champions do and that is fight the true #1 contender and he deserves nothing but respect for that. He took a beating, but he also did all he could and looked better than Ive ever seen him.

In the end, I knew Kellys pressure would wear Taylor's legs and momentum out after a few rounds and he would hurt him eventually and put him in a corner and knock him out on the spot. I was always highly suspicious of Taylors recovery skills, mainly composure wise, so I knew the fight would be over quick after he got hurt. It would have been very wise idea to take a knee or clinch pavlick to survive just like pavlick did to him earlier, but he chose to take his beating instead. Kudos to him. Like Eubank said, thirty three percent of being a great fighter is taking your beatings. The main thing is he accepted the biggest challenge out there and gave his best effort. I have more respect for him now.

Skital · 09-30-2007, 04:37 AM

This is a straight up loser thread.

Ilesey · 09-30-2007, 05:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Boinko

Ah, now it begins. Taylor is a fraud. Taylor was exposed. You realize by doing that you're actually diminishing Pavlik's win. How about acknowledging that Taylor is a damn good fighter, and Kelly beat him a damn good fighter.

That pretty much sums up what I was thinking.

TomaTos · 09-30-2007, 05:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by paulfv

This fight went exactly as I thought, but Taylor got caught in the 7th when I thought he would get caught in the 10th or 11th.

Pavlik is a real fighter, not a joke athlete pretending to be a fighter.

JUSTICE IS SERVED, BIIIIIIOOOOOTTTTCH!!!!!

If Pavlik is the best fighter ever and Taylor is a fraud, how come Taylor almost knock Pavlik out in the second and how come it was dead even after the 6 ?

Actually, this was the best fight Taylor ever fought, Pavlik was just better, it happens. Like Calzague vs Kessler, one guys have to win, the other is no fraud..., he is just the second best in the division. I mean, if Pavlik beat a nobody like you seem to claim, then Pavlik have fought nobody yet and still need to fight a real fighter ? I mean come on, im a huge Pavlik fans and I have to tell you that you look stupid tonight, sorry buddy

!

El Bombasto · 09-30-2007, 06:00 AM

Taylor has nothing to prove. Yes, he's been in a lot of close fights lately, but he has consistently won. Don't diminish what either fighter accomplished tonight with this fraud BS.

paulfv · 09-30-2007, 07:07 AM

Bernard Hopkins -- This fight was for you.

Winky Wright ------ This fight was for you.

Cory Spinks -------- This fight was for you.

To everyone who was SO damn sick of the Lou DiBella, Jim Lampley, HBO biased crap and scoring, to all of those who were going to be robbed tonight by another "Bad Decision," this fight was for you.

Justice, finally.

A real middleweight champion we can feel happy about. A guy who earned his straps.

Tonight, The Fraud was finally sent packing -- no more belts, no more '0.'

A great night for the sport. One of boxing's premiere weight divisions finally has a real champion again.

09-30-2007, 03:08 AM	#46
paulfv Champion East Side Guru Join Date: Jul 2007 Posts: 6,691 vCash: 1000	Re: TOLD YA -- Taylor was a F-R-A-U-D!! I cannot believe on the main board people who picked Taylor to win are trying to convince themselves Taylor would win a rematch and/or this is going to be a trilogy. What a joke! People, the only thing different if these two fight again is that Pavlik doesn't showboat and drop his hands in the 2nd round, and doesn't get dropped. Pavlik will still KO/TKO Taylor, and just as brutally. I cannot be clear enough about this: There is NO, ZERO version of Taylor that can defeat Pavlik in the pros. This isn't the amateurs, and Taylor does not have the tools to beat Pavlik. PERIOD. Taylor is exactly what I said he was -- a FRAUD. He's great against old guys and undersized guys. As soon as he went against a guy who was under 35 and had the offense to back him up (and who wasn't a Jr. Middle), he was going to lose. It could have been Pavlik, it could have been someone else. This is what Jermaine Taylor is -- good not great, right guy at the right time and place to 'hold' the belt for a real champ like a Pavlik. I can't believe how easy Taylor is to hit. Ridiculous. Fruad, back to ARK you go. Thank you, Ghost, for ending the joke played on fans by DiBella and HBO.
Top

09-30-2007, 03:09 AM	#47
brooklyn1550 Roberto Duran East Side VIP Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Michigan Posts: 12,401 vCash: 1000	Re: TOLD YA -- Taylor was a F-R-A-U-D!! This truly was a "throwback" fight...like the days of Graziano, Zale, Basilio, etc...
Top

09-30-2007, 03:19 AM	#48
Farmboxer ESB Junkie East Side VIP Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: USA Posts: 37,659 vCash: 1000	Re: TOLD YA -- Taylor was a F-R-A-U-D!! Pavlik can be proud of himself, damned good fight tonight, exciting for a change. I had Hopkins beating Taylor both times, and I had Winky beating Taylor, also, the fix in was in for Taylor tonight with the damned biased judges, but Pavlik stopped him, good thing, the judges had made up their minds before the fight. I take nothing away from Pavlik, he won the fight against the judges will. And ESPN? They should be ashamed of themselves. Max Kellerman said on ESPN FNF that he would never recognize the WBO title as long as a Klitschko had the title, that says it all.
Top

09-30-2007, 03:35 AM	#52
boxbox Champion East Side Guru Join Date: Feb 2006 Posts: 5,300 vCash: 1000	Re: TOLD YA -- Taylor was a F-R-A-U-D!! Sure he is! so now you can't say Pavlik is good right? any average fighter can beat a fraud imo. And Pavlik almost got ko'd by the fraud... Please, dont take this away from Kelly, he beat a good fighter to say the least!
Top

09-30-2007, 03:55 AM	#53
teekay00 fight ESB Jr Member Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Portland, Oregon Posts: 206 vCash: 1000	Re: TOLD YA -- Taylor was a F-R-A-U-D!! he did lose tonight but he is not a FRAUD. He put Pavlik down and im sure a lot of people thought that was the end of the fight, that would have kept a lot of guys down, not pavlik tho, he got a good heart. Pavlik is a good fighter who has not lost to ANYONE yet ok. Now if he would have been some weaksauce guy with weak losses then you can say Taylor is a fraud but he lost to a very good fighter tonight.
Top

09-30-2007, 04:03 AM	#55
alex-boxer42 Contender ESB Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2006 Posts: 914 vCash: 1000	Re: TOLD YA -- Taylor was a F-R-A-U-D!! ^what? Anyway first of all much to respect to both fighters for putting on a brave and exciting performance and actually giving us our moneys worth. Taylor was a fraud, but it wasnt his fault. It was the fault of the bs judging and whatever connections HBO had to make him out as a star before he really earned it himself. This made him think he was on top the world before he really did anything decisive. I mean, one could make an argument he lost all five of his previous fights. Tonight he did what true champions do and that is fight the true #1 contender and he deserves nothing but respect for that. He took a beating, but he also did all he could and looked better than Ive ever seen him. In the end, I knew Kellys pressure would wear Taylor's legs and momentum out after a few rounds and he would hurt him eventually and put him in a corner and knock him out on the spot. I was always highly suspicious of Taylors recovery skills, mainly composure wise, so I knew the fight would be over quick after he got hurt. It would have been very wise idea to take a knee or clinch pavlick to survive just like pavlick did to him earlier, but he chose to take his beating instead. Kudos to him. Like Eubank said, thirty three percent of being a great fighter is taking your beatings. The main thing is he accepted the biggest challenge out there and gave his best effort. I have more respect for him now.
Top

09-30-2007, 04:37 AM	#56
Skital Belt holder ESB Addict Join Date: Aug 2004 Posts: 3,196 vCash: 1000	Re: TOLD YA -- Taylor was a F-R-A-U-D!! This is a straight up loser thread.
Top

09-30-2007, 06:00 AM	#59
El Bombasto Ask yo momma ESB Addict Join Date: May 2006 Location: Miami Posts: 1,660 vCash: 1000	Re: TOLD YA -- Taylor was a F-R-A-U-D!! Taylor has nothing to prove. Yes, he's been in a lot of close fights lately, but he has consistently won. Don't diminish what either fighter accomplished tonight with this fraud BS.
Top

09-30-2007, 07:07 AM	#60
paulfv Champion East Side Guru Join Date: Jul 2007 Posts: 6,691 vCash: 1000	Re: TOLD YA -- Taylor was a F-R-A-U-D!! Bernard Hopkins -- This fight was for you. Winky Wright ------ This fight was for you. Cory Spinks -------- This fight was for you. To everyone who was SO damn sick of the Lou DiBella, Jim Lampley, HBO biased crap and scoring, to all of those who were going to be robbed tonight by another "Bad Decision," this fight was for you. Justice, finally. A real middleweight champion we can feel happy about. A guy who earned his straps. Tonight, The Fraud was finally sent packing -- no more belts, no more '0.' A great night for the sport. One of boxing's premiere weight divisions finally has a real champion again.
Top