Opinions on this kid - Page 4

01-06-2010, 03:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RDJ

Seconded. Keep Lounge stuff in the Lounge.

Could we move that to Lounge? It's obvious that's a joke thread anyways.

RDJ · 01-06-2010, 03:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KTFO

Could we move that to Lounge? It's obvious that's a joke thread anyways.

No.

01-06-2010, 04:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RDJ

No.

Did you ask?

RDJ · 01-06-2010, 04:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KTFO

Did you ask?

Who do you want me to ask and for what purpose

I asked myself and I said no.

01-06-2010, 04:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RDJ

Who do you want me to ask and for what purpose

I asked myself and I said no.

So you're mod in that section or what?

RDJ · 01-06-2010, 04:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KTFO

So you're mod in that section or what?

Yes. I am a moderator both here and in the Lounge. Can we get on topic again now?

GPater11093 · 01-06-2010, 04:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jeff thomas

Joe mac, further to the responses on here, I think he's decent and looks very heavy handed. His opponents look pretty awful but as noted previously anyone can look good on a highlight reel, thus his opponents are going to look bad as genrally there been chinned. He looks very wild, but australia rarely produced super stylists, more known globally for your atritional types like Fenech, Harding and Katsidis. He looks good....

At 60-5 he should be more refined then he is though and I would question whose actually teaching him.... He's one of two things- a fabulous talent with a shoddy coach... or a fighter of modest ability with a coach whose fabulously switched on to his fighters strengths and weaknesses. So either way there is some good and some bad.

Im sure a Mr Lionel Rose and a Mr Johnny Famechon disagree strongly.

Two of the best boxers i have ever watched.

brown bomber · 01-06-2010, 04:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GPater11093

Im sure a Mr Lionel Rose and a Mr Johnny Famechon disagree strongly.

Two of the best boxers i have ever watched.

Give me another one. For every pure boxer you give me, bet I can name 5-6 ozzie brawlers.

01-06-2010, 04:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RDJ

Yes. I am a moderator both here and in the Lounge. Can we get on topic again now?

Of course. First you should pm that OP kid he should stop insulting posters in the training section. Unless it's Reggie Hammond by Alias.

RDJ · 01-06-2010, 04:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KTFO

Of course. First you should pm that OP kid he should stop insulting posters in the training section. Unless it's Reggie Hammond by Alias.

Again no. Now stop being an ass or fuck off to the lounge.

GPater11093 · 01-06-2010, 06:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jeff thomas

Give me another one. For every pure boxer you give me, bet I can name 5-6 ozzie brawlers.

I cant really, I get your point was more just wanting to be an arse.

lefty · 01-06-2010, 07:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jeff thomas

Give me another one. For every pure boxer you give me, bet I can name 5-6 ozzie brawlers.

You're right, most oz boxers just wanna be tough guys. Not me, i'm a stylist, look out for me!!

joemac · 01-07-2010, 07:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jeff thomas

Joe mac, further to the responses on here, I think he's decent and looks very heavy handed. His opponents look pretty awful but as noted previously anyone can look good on a highlight reel, thus his opponents are going to look bad as genrally there been chinned. He looks very wild, but australia rarely produced super stylists, more known globally for your atritional types like Fenech, Harding and Katsidis. He looks good....

At 60-5 he should be more refined then he is though and I would question whose actually teaching him.... He's one of two things- a fabulous talent with a shoddy coach... or a fighter of modest ability with a coach whose fabulously switched on to his fighters strengths and weaknesses. So either way there is some good and some bad.

Thanks for your opinion Jeff. I know his trainer has been training fighters for many years and has a very close bond with Kye. I hope they kick a goal together and Kye gets all the right help he needs to take him as far as possible.

joemac · 01-07-2010, 07:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Youngblood

Its called google. I looked him up and he is legit and so are his accomplishments. Plenty of articles on the guy. Bearing that in mind he is 2 years older then me but I'd love to have a go at em as I like fighting brawlers.

In the clip he appears to be very wild but watching his full fights he does pick and choose his moments and when he hurts someone he is pretty cool in how he takes them down he's not hell for leather all the time.

thejokerswild · 01-17-2010, 04:50 AM

Kye Mckenzie is definitely legit as far as nsw and aussie amatuers go! Cannot wait to see this guy hit the pros.
(thats if he decides to make the switch ofcourse)

True point about the attrition, brawling style tendency of Australian Boxers. It's hard to explain but sort of expected by the spectator and apart of being an Australian. I cant imagine a highly patient defensive and technical puglist like Floyd Mayweathers or Malinaggi coming from our communities.

Which is a little bit shame but you can't say the local shows are disrespectful.

01-17-2010, 04:50 AM	#60
thejokerswild P4P King East Side VIP Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Australia Posts: 18,179 vCash: 75	Re: Opinions on this kid Kye Mckenzie is definitely legit as far as nsw and aussie amatuers go! Cannot wait to see this guy hit the pros. (thats if he decides to make the switch ofcourse) True point about the attrition, brawling style tendency of Australian Boxers. It's hard to explain but sort of expected by the spectator and apart of being an Australian. I cant imagine a highly patient defensive and technical puglist like Floyd Mayweathers or Malinaggi coming from our communities. Which is a little bit shame but you can't say the local shows are disrespectful.
Top