Why wasnt this a no-contest? - Page 2

Davies · 02-02-2010, 05:47 PM

Its hard to say wether or not he threw the punch before the ref said stop,

Was it declared a no-contest or was it a W on baker's record?

Top Dog · 02-02-2010, 06:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Davies

Its hard to say wether or not he threw the punch before the ref said stop,

Was it declared a no-contest or was it a W on baker's record?

Yeah your right, but the ref was pushing the guy back when he was flushed, should have been a NC

Mandanda · 02-02-2010, 07:10 PM

Barker should of got a count. Peach of a left hook he threw...i don't think he did it on the sly purely accidental imo. It's hard one but based on character and also the way he threw it i doubt he did it knowing it was a break.

icemax · 02-02-2010, 08:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kosaros

He said "stop boxing" - this means that Barker threw an illegal punch, which means the contest should have been declared as a no contest, or Barker should have been disqualified - neither happened and Barker got the win and that was Parris' decision to make, and he got it wrong.

Samuels hadn't stopped and was moving in on Barker...you could argue that Barker was following the refs instructions in defending himself at all times

kosaros · 02-02-2010, 08:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by icemax

Samuels hadn't stopped and was moving in on Barker...you could argue that Barker was following the refs instructions in defending himself at all times

Quite right, I was a little hasty in condemning Barker

TFFP · 02-02-2010, 08:30 PM

Dodgy piece of officiating

Wait a minute who are the involved parties...

OH thats right Dave Parris.

Will anything be done about this crock of shit ref? Don't bet anything on it.

Robert · 02-02-2010, 10:13 PM

i though barker should have been counted

saturday_kid · 02-03-2010, 03:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by brown bomber

If Samuals had of done the same to Barker he'd probably been disqualified.... Smauals stoppage defeat against Groves was bull shit as well.

Whate he said, disgusted me that.

icemax · 02-03-2010, 04:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TFFP

OH thats right Dave Parris.

Will anything be done about this crock of shit ref? Don't bet anything on it.

Come 1st March 2010 he will not be able to officiate in a British ring again

Robney · 02-03-2010, 05:55 AM

It was definitely a no contest... It was a strange situation, with the flash knockdown and all but the ref had to much influence in the ko also.

very bad if this isn't changed to a NC

avidlemon · 02-03-2010, 06:30 AM

barker should have got a count, end of. great ko, but, NC without a doubt. Barker knows it aswell

Mr. V.I.P. · 02-03-2010, 08:26 AM

Dave Parris involved as usual.

Sai · 02-03-2010, 08:28 AM

Obvious NC. Hard for Samuels to defend himself when old Daves got his arm holding his right hand down. Not malicious from Barker, obviously just reactive, but thats pretty much the definition of something that should be ruled an NC

02-02-2010, 05:47 PM	#16
Davies Belt holder ESB Addict Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: He who fears being conquered is sure of defeat Posts: 1,915 vCash: 4614	Re: Why wasnt this a no-contest? Its hard to say wether or not he threw the punch before the ref said stop, Was it declared a no-contest or was it a W on baker's record?
Top

02-02-2010, 07:10 PM	#18
Mandanda British Champion 2010 East Side VIP Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: South London: The Gaza Posts: 12,289 vCash: 1000	Re: Why wasnt this a no-contest? Barker should of got a count. Peach of a left hook he threw...i don't think he did it on the sly purely accidental imo. It's hard one but based on character and also the way he threw it i doubt he did it knowing it was a break.
Top

02-02-2010, 08:30 PM	#21
TFFP The Eskimo East Side VIP Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Reykjavík Posts: 22,556 vCash: 2500	Re: Why wasnt this a no-contest? Dodgy piece of officiating Wait a minute who are the involved parties... OH thats right Dave Parris. Will anything be done about this crock of shit ref? Don't bet anything on it. Last edited by TFFP; 02-02-2010 at 10:15 PM.
Top

02-02-2010, 10:13 PM	#22
Robert Belt holder ESB Addict Join Date: May 2009 Posts: 1,639 vCash: 1000	Re: Why wasnt this a no-contest? i though barker should have been counted
Top

02-03-2010, 05:55 AM	#25
Robney ᴻᴼ ᴸᴼᴻᴳᴲᴿ ᴲ۷ᴵᴸ East Side VIP Join Date: Jan 2010 Location: A hollow vulcano lair! Posts: 18,843 vCash: 3862	Re: Why wasnt this a no-contest? It was definitely a no contest... It was a strange situation, with the flash knockdown and all but the ref had to much influence in the ko also. very bad if this isn't changed to a NC
Top

02-03-2010, 06:30 AM	#26
avidlemon Belt holder ESB Addict Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Big daddy avid sez smigg will be back! Posts: 3,429 vCash: 1000	Re: Why wasnt this a no-contest? barker should have got a count, end of. great ko, but, NC without a doubt. Barker knows it aswell
Top

02-03-2010, 08:26 AM	#27
Mr. V.I.P. Belt holder ESB Addict Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Come at me bro Posts: 2,633 vCash: 75	Re: Why wasnt this a no-contest? Dave Parris involved as usual.
Top

02-03-2010, 08:28 AM	#28
Sai Contender ESB Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Sydney, Aus Posts: 1,478 vCash: 110	Re: Why wasnt this a no-contest? Obvious NC. Hard for Samuels to defend himself when old Daves got his arm holding his right hand down. Not malicious from Barker, obviously just reactive, but thats pretty much the definition of something that should be ruled an NC
Top