|
|
||||||||
|
| View Poll Results: Is Roberto Duran overrated? | |||
| Yes |
|
28 | 34.57% |
| No |
|
53 | 65.43% |
| Voters: 81. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#91 | |
|
So I can die easy ...
East Side VIP
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 21,759
vCash: 1337 |
Quote:
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
|
|
#92 | |
|
Undisputed Champion
East Side VIP
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: "Somebody may beat me, but they are going to have to bleed to do it."
Posts: 12,040
vCash: 856 |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#95 |
|
ESB Junkie
East Side VIP
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 30,719
vCash: 1000 |
Both
Underrated: Practically no one ranks him over Henry Armstrong or Ross for that matter who he is flat out better than imo and a comparable resume and the potential if given the chance to hold FW-WW titles simultaneously Overrated: When people say he was past it/not prepared for all his losses. The myth that get's put about that he wasn't motivated for facing ATG's but was up for facing Davey Moore and Barkley. He had stylistic weaknesses like practically every boxer and his were elite level movement and counter boxers alongside speed but every boxer has issues with speed. His win over Barkley just isn't that good, I mean it's good but not really great and I don't care if he was 70 and he needed a poo in round 6, it doesn't make Barkley great |
|
|
|
#97 | |
|
Champion
East Side Guru
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,959
vCash: 4470 |
Quote:
reminder : Duran was a former 135 vs a 147. Armstrong a former 126 vs a 147 who became d undisputed 160 king . Also , Duran was dirty @ 135 , I still didn't read same thing regarding Armstrong @ any weight . Yes , I rank Armstrong over Duran myself . And no , I rank Duran over Ross myself . Last edited by frankenfrank; 09-27-2011 at 02:08 PM. |
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|