|
|
|
#1 |
|
March 8th, 1971
East Side VIP
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Holland
Posts: 11,749
vCash: 238 |
I think the only fight in which he scored a knockout beyond 8 was against Brennan. Of course that need not indicate bad stamina. Must of the fights he ended by early KO which obviously eliminates the possibilty to prove the ability to score a late knockout.
How would you rank it on a scale of 1 to 5, 1 being Foreman-like, 5 being Marciano/Ali/Frazier/Jeffries-like. |
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Hardest hitting hw ever
East Side Guru
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 6,036
vCash: 1000 |
4
You have to realise though that he fought out in the heat which is far more difficult to do so rather then indoor boxing matches, understandebly because of the heat. Watch him against Gibbons, two year layoff, but he was still throwing alot of punches even at the end |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
1050 psi
ESB Full Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: 167lbs - P4P Baddest
Posts: 352
vCash: 1000 |
4, possibly higher.
Dempsey trained for the long haul (6-7 miles everyday, sparring and further sprinting), but he usually got business over with quickly. |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Diamond Dog
East Side VIP
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 63,260
vCash: 1000 |
Dempsey thew a lot of punches, and to the best of my knowledge continued to throw a lot of punches. I think his inability to KO guys late is more to do with the type of fighter he was than with his stamina.
I'd say 4, as far as elite boxers go. |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Champion
East Side Guru
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,700
vCash: 1000 |
Dempsey booster Damon Runyon called Jack's 15 rounder with Gibbons the fastest heavyweight fight ever fought. Tommy was fading at the end, after over pacing himself through the earlier part of the match. Gibbons peaked later in his career than most boxers, and was in the best shape of his career for the title. Dempsey was coming off a two year layoff. If the Gibbons defense had been scheduled for 20, Tommy may not have finished on his feet, despite Dempsey's inactivity.
Doc Kearns blamed Dempsey's poor performance in the Brennan defense to his violation of the pre-bout celibacy rule, and it's also likely that he took Brennan lightly because of the relatively easy kayo win in their earlier meeting. Still, Dempsey had enough dynamite left to drop the larger Brennan for the count with bodyshots, indicating very solid staying power. It's helpful to recall how torrid the heat and humidity were when he won the title in Toledo, against a defending champion who demonstrated all-time staying power against Jack Johnson in Havana. In a stifling environment, where it was difficult to get any oxygen, he tore away at a ferocious pace through tha last half of the first round, trying desperately to win Kearns's one round kayo bet, was hustled out of the ring quickly, had to rush back in, and resume boxing without any rest between rounds, and still managed not to be outlasted by the endurance champion of Cuba. Today, most fighters who expend themselves like that, in such a situation and climate, would be done for if they failed to take their opponents out, right then and there. I'll give Jack a 4. I can't rate him higher, simply because he didn't have any occasion to perform late, beyond Brennan and Gibbons. I think he compares closely to Louis in the stamina department. |
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
March 8th, 1971
East Side VIP
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Holland
Posts: 11,749
vCash: 238 |
Quote:
I think Louis should rank a bit higher than Dempsey in terms of stamina. It's hard though. You can say that because Dempsey usually went in for the kill early on and moved faster, therefore spending more energy whereas Louis was extremely efficient. Different pacings. |
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Gatekeeper
ESB Full Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 335
vCash: 1000 |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Mystery and Imagination
ESB Addict
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Starving in the belly of a whale
Posts: 4,237
vCash: 1000 |
In his book, Kings of the Ring, Gavin Evans gives a mean assessment of Dempsey, both inside and outside the ring.
He claims that Dempsey's stamina was poor. He said that in the Willard fight Jack was lucky the bout was stopped when it was, as he was himself on the point of exhaustion. Thoughts? |
|
|
|
#13 |
|
ヒップホップ·プロデューサー
East Side VIP
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: 黒人文化の恋人のサンプリ
Posts: 18,790
vCash: 1500 |
4
he he threw alot of shots but from what i see he just doesnt hit as hard later but still has the ability to throw the punches. this would be a very useful technique to switch form hard shots to soft but point hitting shots later in the bout. |
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Black Sash
East Side Guru
Join Date: May 2007
Location: InYourMouth, NC
Posts: 6,550
vCash: 1000 |
Your body has fast twitch, and slow twitch, muscle fibers. The description of Dempsey in articles, plus what film we have of him, looks as though he has more fast than slow. Fast fibers give you more speed bursts, but they also burn out quicker. Because he was an explosive puncher, rather than a thudding type, the steam comes off quicker. He looked like he had enough wind to keep fighting, but the umphhh probably burned up after 8.
If you are asking about stamina, and meaning the ability to last, probably an 8 or 10. If you are talking about his punches meaning as much late as they did early, more like a 5. |
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Diamond Dog
East Side VIP
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 63,260
vCash: 1000 |
Quote:
I think, having seen the fight, the description of Dempsey as the lucky one in that stoppage is a little odd. What was it? Broken eye socket, broken cheek bone, three broken ribs? Dempsey looked ok to me as far as it goes, but he basically spent an unprecidented amount of time throwing power punches - possibley still unequaled to this day in fact. Knacker anyone a bit. |
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|