|
|
||||||||
|
| View Poll Results: Does Prince 'Naz' Hamed deserve spot in Boxing's Hall of Fame? | |||
| Yes |
|
52 | 70.27% |
| No |
|
22 | 29.73% |
| Voters: 74. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Journeywoman
ESB Addict
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,846
vCash: 1000 |
Prince Naseem Hamed has been proposed for induction into the International Boxing Hall of Fame - does he deserve a spot?
Vote and discuss. |
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Undisputed Champion
East Side VIP
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 14,013
vCash: 1000 |
Yes, as it's to do with fame not how great a boxers you where, if it was to do with the best boxers then it would be a no.
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Emeritus Status Barbarian
East Side VIP
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Scotland
Posts: 10,773
vCash: 628 |
A great boxer, a great entertainer... If an utter cunt like Carlos Monzon can get in, then Naseem's misdemeanours can easily be overlooked.
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Journeyman
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 82
vCash: 1000 |
Carlos Monzon is regarded as one of the best middleweights of all time, Naseem is not regarded as one of the best featherweights of all time, who did he beat?
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Emeritus Status Barbarian
East Side VIP
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Scotland
Posts: 10,773
vCash: 628 |
Quote:
As for Hamed, I think you'll find that most people do have him on their list. To say he never beat anyone significant is to demonstrate an utter ignorance of boxing, and thus to lose all credibility. In short, I recommend you start finding out about the sport before you mouth off about all-time greats.
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Journeyman
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 82
vCash: 1000 |
He did not beat anyone regarded as near hof, entertainment value, then yes he was entertaining and could get in their on that aspect....but not quality of opposition and wins.
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Undisputed Champion
East Side VIP
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 14,013
vCash: 1000 |
Thats not how you get into the boxing hall of fame, who you beat etc doesn't mean anything it's all about the name not who's the best boxer.
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Emeritus Status Barbarian
East Side VIP
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Scotland
Posts: 10,773
vCash: 628 |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Champion
East Side Guru
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: South of London
Posts: 9,787
vCash: 0 |
Naseem had fame, thus he should be there. The Hall of Fame is not necessarily for great fighters, but for famous ones. How else would Barry McGuigan be there?
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Journeyman
ESB Jr Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 127
vCash: 1000 |
Naz was good for the sport. Anyone who says otherwise is a hater. He was one of the biggest box office draws of the 90s. Boxing needs big names like him, or the lower tier fighters wouldn't make as much money.
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Contender
ESB Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,319
vCash: 1166 |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Monzon-like
East Side Guru
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Edinburgh
Posts: 8,804
vCash: 484 |
How anyone can say Monzon doesn't deserve to be in Hall Of Fame is laughable, what thre fuck are you smoking Kurgan. Thats right up their with saying Duran or SRR should not be in it. Yes he was a flawed man outside of the ring, but he is undoubdtedly the greatest middleweight fighter of all time.Jeez
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|