British Lightweight Rankings

IronBull · 10-25-2007, 06:21 PM

top 10?

Claypole · 10-25-2007, 06:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by IronBull

top 10?

Go on then.

Healy · 10-26-2007, 04:58 AM

Ask this man
[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]

Hes being on the end of beatings from most of them!

The Lads · 10-26-2007, 05:08 AM

Mine, would probably look something like the below, although quite a few of them could be switched around. Khan Earl for example, and 4-7 can be switched about too.

1. Thaxton
2. Earl
3. Khan
4. Meager
5. Mcallister
6. Murray
7. Fewkes
8. Limmond
9. Stewart
10. Lawton

LeedsLad · 10-26-2007, 05:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Lads

Mine, would probably look something like the below, although quite a few of them could be switched around. Khan Earl for example, and 4-7 can be switched about too.

1. Thaxton
2. Earl
3. Khan
4. Meager
5. Mcallister
6. Murray
7. Fewkes
8. Limmond
9. Stewart
10. Lawton

Seems pretty good to me. Id put Limond 5th though, i think he is more accomplished than 6-8 places.

The Lads · 10-26-2007, 05:31 AM

Always subjective arent they !! I kind of agree though, Ive rated Earl above Khan on accomplishment, and yet Murray and Fewkes above Limmond on potential - no consistency.

stake501 · 10-26-2007, 10:23 PM

limond imo is better than earl

Big Ears · 10-27-2007, 06:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stake501

limond imo is better than earl

I'd agree , but Earl has achieved more which is why he would be ranked higher .

The Lads · 10-27-2007, 01:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stake501

limond imo is better than earl

Kastidis and the win against Romanov put him higher for me. Plus Earls beaten a ruck of domestic fighters.

rooq · 10-27-2007, 06:20 PM

i'd defo have limond above murray, fewkes and mcallister. not earl though, who's established top 2.

i'm still gutted he pulled out of the chance to fight thaxton!

The Lads · 10-27-2007, 07:37 PM

good debates this one, interestin to hear how people judge top 10's.

curry · 10-28-2007, 11:26 AM

Earl
Thaxton
Meager
Stewart
Khan
Murray
Mcallister
Limond
Fewkes
Buckland

10-28-2007, 03:38 PM

Khan
Thaxton
Earl
Meager
Limond
Murray
Mcallister
Fewkes
Lawton
Stewart

Thats my guess. It seems we have a decent competive division at the moment with a couple of fighters looking to go onto better things , a few who a very capable domestic fighters and some highly rated prospects who we can hopefully get excited about soon.

I put Khan on top because I believe he has the talent and ability to beat the rest and can only see a Thaxton lucky thump getting the win against him. No one will get a decision on the boy because he is too well backed by the money people for tha to happen.

10-25-2007, 06:21 PM	#1
IronBull Contender ESB Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Greater Manchester Posts: 590 vCash: 1000	British Lightweight Rankings top 10?
Top

10-26-2007, 04:58 AM	#3
Healy Former Wee Poof East Side VIP Join Date: Feb 2006 Posts: 14,451 vCash: 75	Re: British Lightweight Rankings Ask this man [Only registered and activated users can see links. ] Hes being on the end of beatings from most of them!
Top

10-26-2007, 05:08 AM	#4
The Lads Contender ESB Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Posts: 822 vCash: 1000	Re: British Lightweight Rankings Mine, would probably look something like the below, although quite a few of them could be switched around. Khan Earl for example, and 4-7 can be switched about too. 1. Thaxton 2. Earl 3. Khan 4. Meager 5. Mcallister 6. Murray 7. Fewkes 8. Limmond 9. Stewart 10. Lawton
Top

10-26-2007, 05:31 AM	#6
The Lads Contender ESB Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Posts: 822 vCash: 1000	Re: British Lightweight Rankings Always subjective arent they !! I kind of agree though, Ive rated Earl above Khan on accomplishment, and yet Murray and Fewkes above Limmond on potential - no consistency.
Top

10-26-2007, 10:23 PM	#7
stake501 Contender ESB Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2007 Posts: 629 vCash: 1000	Re: British Lightweight Rankings limond imo is better than earl
Top

10-27-2007, 06:20 PM	#10
rooq ... East Side Guru Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Manchester, UK Posts: 6,329 vCash: 1000	Re: British Lightweight Rankings i'd defo have limond above murray, fewkes and mcallister. not earl though, who's established top 2. i'm still gutted he pulled out of the chance to fight thaxton!
Top

10-27-2007, 07:37 PM	#11
The Lads Contender ESB Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Posts: 822 vCash: 1000	Re: British Lightweight Rankings good debates this one, interestin to hear how people judge top 10's.
Top

10-28-2007, 11:26 AM	#12
curry Journeyman ESB Jr Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Posts: 114 vCash: 1000	Re: British Lightweight Rankings Earl Thaxton Meager Stewart Khan Murray Mcallister Limond Fewkes Buckland
Top

10-28-2007, 03:38 PM	#13
dwilson Guest Posts: n/a vCash:	Re: British Lightweight Rankings Khan Thaxton Earl Meager Limond Murray Mcallister Fewkes Lawton Stewart Thats my guess. It seems we have a decent competive division at the moment with a couple of fighters looking to go onto better things , a few who a very capable domestic fighters and some highly rated prospects who we can hopefully get excited about soon. I put Khan on top because I believe he has the talent and ability to beat the rest and can only see a Thaxton lucky thump getting the win against him. No one will get a decision on the boy because he is too well backed by the money people for tha to happen.
Top