|
|
|
#1 |
|
Undisputed Champion
East Side VIP
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: "Somebody may beat me, but they are going to have to bleed to do it."
Posts: 12,040
vCash: 856 |
understand that at his best Jimmy Bivins was very good, but this was latter in his career. Was he still a formidable oppoenentfor Joe Louis or was he just a name with not much left?
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Barry
East Side VIP
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Scotland
Posts: 26,118
vCash: 836 |
The thing with Bivins though he was periodically able to turn in an absoloutly superb performance post-prime. He was inconsistent in this time frame but he also racked up some really good wins.
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Champion
East Side Guru
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,959
vCash: 4470 |
Orirray obviously lacks forum generalship among everything else really .
remark : when i noticed this thread it was immediately next 2 another thread regarding Bivins vs Louis . |
|
|
|
#13 |
|
GolovKING
East Side Guru
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Arizona / Michoacán
Posts: 8,077
vCash: 2577 |
Of course, not. Many of the ones you bring back would just be re-posted over and over. Some of them have got an additional 5+ pages of discussion after you've brought them back.
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Contender
ESB Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 759
vCash: 500 |
Louis was five years older Bivins and had been a professional six years longer.
He was just that much better than Bivins ever was. If they had met in their primes rather than Louis going off to help the war effort the conclusion of this fight would have been much more decisive with Louis the victor. Just one man's opinion |
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|