|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Champion
East Side Guru
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Miami FL, USA
Posts: 9,730
vCash: 153 |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
ESB's Chinchecker
East Side VIP
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: The Ivory Tower
Posts: 40,639
vCash: 500 |
I rank him # 3. IMO, the GOAT debate should really be a three way affair. Dempsey is horribly underrated today. Until the guys who actually saw him fight started dying off, he was generally thought to have been greater than Louis. I'm not saying he was, but he was closer than people seem to think today.
Dempsey didn't just beat his opponents, he beat them up. People can downgrade his opposition all they want, but Dempsey didn't just beat the guys he fought, he destroyed them. That sort of dominance has to count for something - and like I said, it used to count for a great deal until the guys that followed his career passed away. |
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
vCash: |
Quote:
I think he rates higher on who he can beat. Taken at his absolute peak I think he has a chance of beating any fighter that ever lived. On his actual achievements ie. factor in the quality of opposition he actually beat and his amount of meaningful wins in his prime, I'd rate him lower, but still in the top 15, and probably top 10. |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
P4P King
East Side VIP
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 19,024
vCash: 1000 |
There are a few heavyweights that I would not give any human being who had ever boxed much better than even odds against. Dempsey is one of them. As an ofensive fighter and infighter he is without peer at heavyweight.
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
P4P King
East Side VIP
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 19,024
vCash: 1000 |
Quote:
Don't doubt for a second that the knockout was legitimate. |
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
ESB Junkie
East Side VIP
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 30,726
vCash: 1000 |
Around 11 or 12 - my HW list is on my other PC
Reasons for him not making the top10 1. Never beat a top30 ranked HW of all time 2. Weak overall comp 3. Never faced the best HWs of his era Wills, Langford, Godfrey, McVea, Jeanette, Jack Johnson, Harry Greb 4. Wills fought in the same ts Dempsey and has a better resume than Dempsey fighting much better competition. 5. Very innactive as champion 6. Losses to Tunney and in his days as a contender hurt him. The following have far better wins in defining fights: Ali, Foreman, Frazier, Wills, Langford, Tyson, Holmes, Louis, Schmelling, Marciano, Walcott, Charles, Lennox Lewis, Holyfield, Bowe, Liston, Tunney, Jack Johnson. Last edited by PowerPuncher; 06-18-2007 at 06:20 AM. |
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
P4P King
East Side VIP
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 19,024
vCash: 1000 |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Diamond Dog
East Side VIP
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 63,251
vCash: 1000 |
Johnson is one of the fighters I know a little bit about; I'm quite happy he didn't take a dive.
I have Dempsey at #12. This is based primarily on how I see him going head to head and what i've seen him do on film. He'd be a handful for anyone, though I see the top guys beating him 2/3. If Dempsey had Greb, Wills and maybe McVey (?) on his resume then i'd have to re-think things. Those would be some scalps. I know i'm in the minority, but I also think he should have entertained Johnson. |
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Diamond Dog
East Side VIP
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 63,251
vCash: 1000 |
Quote:
At least Willard assembled a mad travelling circus type affair. Dempsey just fannied about. |
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|