|
|
|
#4 |
|
Champion
East Side Guru
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: New York
Posts: 8,186
vCash: 1000 |
Norton was a rhythm breaker and although Eddie had power not the kind that is a definite to beat Kenny. I think Kenny's awkward style gives him the edge for the nod over 10
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
P4P King
East Side VIP
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: The Sea of Tranquility
Posts: 22,189
vCash: 1000 |
Norton could have won a decision in this one by doing his "foot in the bucket", spoil the boxers "stuff" approach that he was so good at...this made easier for him by virtue of his size advantages that he would have had over Machen...the same would have been true vs Zora Folley, BTW.
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,494
vCash: 500 |
This fight could be like a Ken Norton vs. Jimmy Young fight.
But Eddie had more power than Jimmy, and would have made it a little interesting in San Diego, Norton 6-4-2 in 12 rounds. |
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Undisputed Champion
East Side VIP
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Chicago, Illinois USA
Posts: 12,502
vCash: 1000 |
I think Norton has the best chance.
Eddie was a very good boxer, but more of a one dimensional sort. He did not have the abilities that Ali, Holmes or Young had in that department, nor was he as durable as those guys. I could see Ken winning a comfortable decision, or even a late stoppage on the right night. |
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,494
vCash: 500 |
This is a nice safe fight too.
Nobody get hurts in 'sunny southern' California. I would have liked a 1962 Cleveland Williams vs. 1973 Kenny Norton. And throw in an (undefeated) early-1966 Joey Orbillo vs 1962 (undefeated) Billy Daniels as the 'undercard'. |
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
P4P King
East Side VIP
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 17,716
vCash: 1000 |
Quote:
This is a close fight I lean slightly towards Norton ,but Eddie could take a dec. |
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|