|
|
|
#32 | |
|
ATG list Killah!
East Side VIP
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: ......Bit stalkerish to ask where I live don't ya think?
Posts: 10,906
vCash: 85 |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#33 | |
|
Lowering Post Count
East Side VIP
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Brunoilia, Hehsland
Posts: 51,290
vCash: 7500 |
![]() Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#38 |
|
Contender
ESB Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 886
vCash: 500 |
My, my...what a lively discourse! Boxed Ears is a hilarious and talented writer...I give him that, gladly. I don't agree with him that it's a "silly" match-up, but I can't say it's all that relevant either.
George Foreman, Ron Lyle, and Earnie Shavers are what used to be known as "stand-up punchers", highly dangerous but not particularly crafty in their attacks. Frazier is a different animal, a swarmer, bobber/weaver type. He throws a high volume and wears you out through accumulated pain and exhaustion. I think Il Duce is right on the money when he compares this to Frazier-Ellis. Jimmy would frustrate Joe for a few rounds, but I can't see a guy of questionable mental toughness lasting the distance, much less beating, the Joe Frazier who mauled Muhammed Ali for 15 rounds in '71. It's the wrong style for Young, as others noted, and Joe's will to win is so much stronger. Most likely a sustained beating for Young, that's all. |
|
|
|
#39 |
|
Champion
East Side Guru
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: New York
Posts: 8,189
vCash: 1000 |
Frazier was different animal then the slow punchers like Lyle,Foreman etc., Frazier was a pressure fighter wrong style for Jimmy because Joe was active and went to the body and head well, still Jimmy would be competitive and land his share of punches on Joe, however Young did not have the power to hurt Joe...Frazier by a close UD over 12 and could get a ref stop (hard to do over Young) over 15 or a close UD
|
|
|
|
#40 |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: The City!
Posts: 3,273
vCash: 1000 |
This is not a mismatch for several reasons. Yes, most would favor Frazier in this match-up but to me Young has that Philly heart and skill to make this fight very compeative. Young, fought and drew with Shavers who hit just as hard if not harder than Frazier as well as Foreman, Lyle and Norton. I don't think Frazier could take out Young with one powerful shot. I like this match-up I have to got with Frazier by a close UD.
|
|
|
|
#41 |
|
P4P King
East Side VIP
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: The Sea of Tranquility
Posts: 22,204
vCash: 1000 |
I believe that however being on the short side of a points verdict, that Young would last 15 rounds with Frazier..Jimmy's creative negativity works against just about everyone except for the tireless Frazier..and going back in decades, perhaps Marciano as well..Frazier and Marciano never tired..never gave up or got discouraged..and would be content to hit whatever target was available, with swarming aggression. Yes...my man Jimmy would be in 100% survival mode, and he had the chin and wherewithall to survive to the final bell even against Frazier.
|
|
|
|
#44 | |
|
ATG list Killah!
East Side VIP
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: ......Bit stalkerish to ask where I live don't ya think?
Posts: 10,906
vCash: 85 |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#45 |
|
Undisputed Champion
East Side VIP
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 12,312
vCash: 1000 |
Just watched Young-Norton. How the F is this considered a robbery? Norton was the clear winner. I had him 9-5-1 (as had two of the judges). Several rounds were close and I wouldn't complain if someone wanted to give Young one or two more rounds than I did. But no way did he win more rounds than Norton, and the notion of this being a robbery is absolutely ridicolous.
I was a bit surprised that Norton outjabbed Young. Jimmy threw a lot of jabs, but hardly nothing on them. Very few scored effectively. Last edited by Bokaj; 02-21-2011 at 04:57 PM. |
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|