Boxing  

Forum Home Boxing Forum European British Classic Aussie MMA Training
Go Back   Boxing News 24 Forum > Boxing > Classic Boxing Forum


View Poll Results: Who's juicing?
Pacquiao 5 26.32%
Holyfield 14 73.68%
Voters: 19. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 02-22-2011, 02:09 PM   #1
D.T
Contender
ESB Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,009
vCash: 500
Default Since neither were ever PROVEN guilty - who was/is the more likely juicer?

Holyfield or Pacquiao?
D.T is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 02-22-2011, 02:10 PM   #2
D.T
Contender
ESB Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,009
vCash: 500
Default Re: Since neither were ever PROVEN guilty - who was/is the more likely juicer?

I say Pacquiao just becuase I like Evander more.
D.T is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2011, 02:11 PM   #3
D.T
Contender
ESB Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,009
vCash: 500
Default Re: Since neither were ever PROVEN guilty - who was/is the more likely juicer?

I also say Pacquiao because Holyfield never DOMINATED much bigger fighters than himself.

Pacquiao was getting KOed by nobody Flyweights and now is DOMINATING guys much bigger than him like mad.


Pacman's juicing folks!
D.T is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2011, 02:13 PM   #4
goat15
Gatekeeper
ESB Full Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 462
vCash: 500
Default Re: Since neither were ever PROVEN guilty - who was/is the more likely juicer?

based purely on whose weight gain was more likely to have needed assistance - holyfield.
goat15 is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2011, 02:32 PM   #5
Napoleon
Smokin'
ESB Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,195
vCash: 75
Default Re: Since neither were ever PROVEN guilty - who was/is the more likely juicer?

Are you guys serious? This thread is a joke.

Pacqauio has no evidence against him, and no one even said he was taking roids until Mayweather decided to run his mouth instead of fighting, while "Evan Fields" was on the BALCO list of buyers.

I don't care who you like more, Evander Holyfield is a juicer while Pacqauio is not.
Napoleon is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2011, 02:43 PM   #6
Swarmer
Patrick
East Side Guru
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: You know you done fucked up right? You know that right?
Posts: 9,852
vCash: 1035
Default Re: Since neither were ever PROVEN guilty - who was/is the more likely juicer?

easily holyroid. the balding, balco mail in list, weird body changes...
Swarmer is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2011, 02:54 PM   #7
goat15
Gatekeeper
ESB Full Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 462
vCash: 500
Default Re: Since neither were ever PROVEN guilty - who was/is the more likely juicer?

here's a question... how does holyfield's steroid controversy affect his legacy in your eyes?
goat15 is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2011, 03:05 PM   #8
janitor
P4P King
East Side VIP
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 20,610
vCash: 1000
Default Re: Since neither were ever PROVEN guilty - who was/is the more likely juicer?

I have to say Holyfield, because there is direct evidence linking him to the acquisition of steroids and none in Pacquiao's case.
janitor is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2011, 03:24 PM   #9
Napoleon
Smokin'
ESB Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,195
vCash: 75
Default Re: Since neither were ever PROVEN guilty - who was/is the more likely juicer?

Anybody know at what period Holyfield started or took roids? I know the mail list came out not that many years ago, but any idea how long he was on there?

Also, Holyfield gained 20-30lbs of muscle for the second Bowe fight, could that be because of roids because he didn't seem to lose any speed like others have.
Napoleon is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2011, 03:32 PM   #10
D.T
Contender
ESB Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,009
vCash: 500
Default Re: Since neither were ever PROVEN guilty - who was/is the more likely juicer?

You all a bunch of dumb mother****ers. Go back to the Genral Forum.


So Pacquiao getting KOed by nobody Flyweights and then not too long after DOMINATING Light-Middleweight does not seem suspicious in yor eyes?

Holyfield struggling with Cooper, Qawi, Foreman, Holmes, Bowe, Lewis etc is evidence of roiding?


OK... dumb ****s.


Tell me that's not steroids...

[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]
D.T is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2011, 03:42 PM   #11
goat15
Gatekeeper
ESB Full Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 462
vCash: 500
Default Re: Since neither were ever PROVEN guilty - who was/is the more likely juicer?

Quote:
Originally Posted by D.T View Post
So Pacquiao getting KOed by nobody Flyweights and then not too long after DOMINATING Light-Middleweight does not seem suspicious in yor eyes?

Holyfield struggling with Cooper, Qawi, Foreman, Holmes, Bowe, Lewis etc is evidence of roiding?
plenty of great fighters have been on the wrong end of knock outs early in their careers. it's boxing, you're getting punched in the face... henry armstrong lost his very first fight by KO, but came back strongly and is now in most people's top five of all time. as a career progresses, fighters learn to protect their weaknesses, or just become battle-hardened.

pacquiao has not dominated 154, he has one good win against margarito... pacquiao's comfortable at 140-145, and has been for most of his career, he just used to cut down more.
goat15 is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2011, 03:56 PM   #12
D.T
Contender
ESB Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,009
vCash: 500
Default Re: Since neither were ever PROVEN guilty - who was/is the more likely juicer?

What has Holyfield done that would make you suspicious? - Nothing

What has Pacroid done that would make you suspicious? - The list if ****ing endless
D.T is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2011, 03:57 PM   #13
D.T
Contender
ESB Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,009
vCash: 500
Default Re: Since neither were ever PROVEN guilty - who was/is the more likely juicer?

*is
D.T is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2011, 04:02 PM   #14
goat15
Gatekeeper
ESB Full Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 462
vCash: 500
Default Re: Since neither were ever PROVEN guilty - who was/is the more likely juicer?

Quote:
Originally Posted by D.T View Post
What has Holyfield done that would make you suspicious? - Nothing

What has Pacroid done that would make you suspicious? - The list if ****ing endless
the difference in holyfield's physical appearance between the first and second bowe fights is immense.
goat15 is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2011, 04:08 PM   #15
janitor
P4P King
East Side VIP
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 20,610
vCash: 1000
Default Re: Since neither were ever PROVEN guilty - who was/is the more likely juicer?

Quote:
Originally Posted by D.T View Post
What has Holyfield done that would make you suspicious? - Nothing

What has Pacroid done that would make you suspicious? - The list if ****ing endless
Personaly, I will give a fighter the benefit of the doubt, until some direct evidence emerges against them.

Now Holyfield has basicaly been caught red handed buying steroids and Pacquiao has not.

Sam Langford would almost certainly have been acused of taking steroids today, but he didn't because they did not exist back then.
janitor is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Reply

Boxing News 24 Forum > Boxing > Classic Boxing Forum

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump





All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:45 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Boxing News 24 Forum 2013