|
|
|
#61 | |
|
THROW SOME THUNDAAAH!!!!
East Side Guru
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Washington D.C.
Posts: 5,273
vCash: 75 |
Quote:
All Hail the Mighty Mop, for it decides who goes and who stays. |
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
|
|
#62 | |
|
P4P King
East Side VIP
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 17,580
vCash: 1000 |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#63 |
|
♧ OG Kally ♤
East Side VIP
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: from parts unknown
Posts: 10,657
vCash: 1200 |
I think a theoretical Peak '83 Spinks properly bulked up to 185lbs with intense conditioning could give Marciano an awkward, difficult fight with his very cagey boxing skills, great ring intelligence (with Futch in corner), plus blistering speed, pinpoint accuracy, great timing & spectacular combinations. It all depends how well Michael could carry 185lbs.
Outcome: Marciano late KO (while maybe a bit behind on cards), he slowly grinds down Spinks with vicious body punches throughout the fight & eventually stops him in rounds 8-15. |
|
|
|
#64 |
|
Journeyman
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 87
vCash: 500 |
Marciano, behind on all three scorecards stops spinks in the mid rounds. Spinks awkward and busy style gives him the early advantage but Marciano is simply too strong for him. When spinks slows down, he will be caught.
|
|
|
|
#65 |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: bad to the bone and sexy
Posts: 3,957
vCash: 500 |
Imagine if the only rated heavyweight rocky ever beat was old joe louis and it went the distance. thats micheal spinks heavyweight resume right there.
|
|
|
|
#66 | |
|
♧ OG Kally ♤
East Side VIP
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: from parts unknown
Posts: 10,657
vCash: 1200 |
Quote:
![]() That's a terrible analysis, Louis was Shot against Marciano, whereas the ageing Holmes was of '85 was 3 years Past-Prime, but still a very good quality 48-0 undefeated boxer. Christ, even the very Old Holmes of '95 who beat McCall (with correct scoring), was better than the Shot Louis that Rocky beat. As for using "went the distance" against Spinks, he was coming up from Light Heavy, to fight an Iron-Chinned undefeated savvy Heavyweight Champion, who had legendary powers of recuperation & survival... |
|
|
|
|
#67 | |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: bad to the bone and sexy
Posts: 3,957
vCash: 500 |
Quote:
perhaps I could find a beter analysis, but until then it shal do for now. Louis was beating rated contenders- lee savold among them who held a claim to a lightly regarded "world" title for beating bruce woodcock- had that been the 1980s there would have been a sactioning fee from that fight going to either the ibf, wba or wbc uprating a marcianos pts win over Louis to something not too far away from what spinks acheived against Holmes. Louis was 37 years old, 66-2, unbeaten in his last 9 and had a 19 pound weight advantage over marciano. Holmes was 36 years old, indeed 48-0 and had a 18 pound advantage over spinks. Last edited by choklab; 03-15-2011 at 04:25 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#68 | |
|
Historian/Film Maker
East Side Guru
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 6,476
vCash: 1000 |
Quote:
Love this point .. the Louis of the Marciano bout matched up as comparable with the Holmes of the Spinks fights ... this says it all ... ... of course it shall do for now ...
|
|
|
|
|
#71 |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: bad to the bone and sexy
Posts: 3,957
vCash: 500 |
Old Holmes would beat old louis, it was not the win of marciano's career. IMAGINE if marciano could not knock out old man louis though? Sure Holmes was beter but did spinks even beat Holmes? he did not exchange or fight with Holmes, he tricked him, he got by, nobody got beat up.
where is the evidence spinks could have knocked out old Louis? After all Spinks never knocked out ANY or even fought ANY rated contenders. How many of these guys could micheal spinks beat who he could of fought to get that crack at Holmes? Thomas tucker tubbs witherspoon page weaver coetzee truth wiliams bruno terel biggs |
|
|
|
#72 | |
|
Champion
East Side Guru
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: New York
Posts: 8,194
vCash: 1000 |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#73 | |
|
Champion
East Side Guru
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: New York
Posts: 8,194
vCash: 1000 |
Quote:
Nailed it
|
|
|
|
|
#74 |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: bad to the bone and sexy
Posts: 3,957
vCash: 500 |
.
People knock holmes and would like the rest of the world to believe that the best contenders were tied up to alternative belts and Holmes got away without fighting them but its not the truth. Almost from the start of his run as a champion to the end of his title days the first real alternative champion and the last were both Kayoed by Holmes. The ones in the middle just kept losing. when he was retired he could argue he beat all three of the remaining champions smith, berbick and spinks. Totaly with you on this one. I beleive kid mathews is a 50-50 fight for spinks since he had about the same number of fights at HW. |
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|