|
|
|
#1 | |
|
Haye KTFO1 Wlad
ESB Addict
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,893
vCash: 1075 |
Quote:
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Rob Palmer
East Side Guru
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 6,807
vCash: 75 |
he is right. fighters today have allot of advantages due to technology and science....even though allot of british trainers and fighters still fail to adapt to new methods.
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
JMM beat Pac-Man 3 Times
East Side VIP
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Vicente Carrillo Fuentes Organization HQ, Home of Team Mexico
Posts: 15,044
vCash: 75 |
anything below 4% is unhealthy/not good for u is it
aint that swimmer phelps something like that tho, not sure |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Rule Britannia
Posts: 1,606
vCash: 1000 |
It's the same in most sports. The science involved these days massively improves the athletic performance. The 2% body fat part is nonsense though.
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
HAWK TIME!!!!
East Side Guru
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 5,152
vCash: 75 |
I think Science gives modern fighters the ability to be more fitter as our understanding of sports has evolved, but I disagree with them actually being fitter, fighters of yesteryear on average fought at a much higher intensity and had better endurance which would be sustained throughout a fight through a much longer distance.
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|