|
|
||||||||
|
| View Poll Results: Did they test? | |||
| No, they didn't test them |
|
47 | 34.31% |
| Yes, of course they did |
|
71 | 51.82% |
| Yes, but they tested positive and hiding results |
|
19 | 13.87% |
| Voters: 137. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#17 |
|
Journeyman
ESB Jr Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 258
vCash: 500 |
I think Floyd jr tested positive that's why USADA can't release the result because he is their boss or there is no USADA test that's why they didn't show it in 24/7 though they have "net articles about it"... Wouldn't really surprise me if Floyd jr tested positive with his roid rage obviously he's a heavy user...
|
|
|
|
#26 |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Livermore, CA
Posts: 2,466
vCash: 1000 |
People in this thread are pretty fucking stupid, seriously. Yes, they did testing.
The USADA gives their results to the NSAC who is responsible for enforcement of their own PED policies. The USADA does not "punish" boxers if they test positive, the State Athletic Commission does. When the NSAC said both fighters came up clean, that means: "ALL TEST RESULTS (Including the USADA tests) have been done, and both fighters are clean." The USADA does not need to make a separate statement saying the exact same thing. That is redundant and unnecessary as the NSAC is the governing body, not the USADA. You people really are not very bright huh? I wonder how many ditch diggers, shoe salesmen, and fast food workers we got in here, seriously. You guys make Forrest Gump look like a Rhodes Scholar. |
|
|
|
#27 | |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 4,625
vCash: 500 |
Quote:
Unless you can provide a proof that says otherwise. |
|
|
|
|
#28 | |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Livermore, CA
Posts: 2,466
vCash: 1000 |
Quote:
They shouldn't have to mention the USADA tests as "separate." There is absolutely no need. It's redundant. If morons want to run around thinking that there was no random testing done, when both fighters signed a contract stating that there would be, then keep clucking like a bunch of old hens then. That doesn't change the facts that testing was done and both fighters came up clean. It was in a SIGNED CONTRACT gentlemen. Not exactly easy to back out of signed contracts. Seriously, you guys are fucking morons. Of course, the general public is pretty stupid on average anyways. I'm going back to my Ivory Tower now with the other educated people. Peace. |
|
|
|
|
#29 | |
|
The Black Bandit
ESB Addict
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 3,187
vCash: 500 |
Quote:
What's your source? According to this: [Only registered and activated users can see links. ] Floyd Mayweather Jr and Victor Ortiz have had their urine tested as part of the official drug tests sanctioned by the Nevada State Athletic Commission (NASC), and both fighters have supplied clean urine, according to NASC chairman Keith Kizer. The testing is routine for the commission and is not part of the additional random blood testing - conducted by the United States Anti-Doping Agency – that the two boxers are also contractually obliged to. And this: [Only registered and activated users can see links. ] The first round of Nevada State Athletic Commission drug testing for Floyd Mayweather Jr and Victor Ortiz came back clean yesterday. To be clear, this is not the random USADA testing that Mayweather and Ortiz are doing, but part one of three Nevada tests. |
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Livermore, CA
Posts: 2,466
vCash: 1000 |
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|