|
|
||||||||
|
| View Poll Results: Did they test? | |||
| No, they didn't test them |
|
47 | 34.31% |
| Yes, of course they did |
|
71 | 51.82% |
| Yes, but they tested positive and hiding results |
|
19 | 13.87% |
| Voters: 137. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#91 | |
|
2011 Poster of the Year
East Side VIP
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: GA
Posts: 33,587
vCash: 524 |
Quote:
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
|
|
#92 |
|
2011 Poster of the Year
East Side VIP
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: GA
Posts: 33,587
vCash: 524 |
Quote:
Do you guys really think there was no testing done
|
|
|
|
#93 |
|
2011 Poster of the Year
East Side VIP
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: GA
Posts: 33,587
vCash: 524 |
There seems to be some fuss going around, so I just wanted to see where everybody was at?
Do you think USADA did the testing for Mayweather and Ortiz? |
|
|
|
#98 | |
|
504
ESB Addict
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,564
vCash: 500 |
Quote:
Wouldn't that be a nice start to "cleaning up" the sport of boxing by having not only you, but everyone you are associated with, "take the test" |
|
|
|
|
#99 |
|
Champion
East Side Guru
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 7,165
vCash: 9062 |
All I can say is LOL... Sorry Victor879 but it's a lose lose battle man.. You bring up common sense and they don't understand.. You bring up facts THEY posted links to and they still don't understand. LOL. The test results weren't released like May-Mosley because it wasn't controversy like that fight around testing, and the results were negative. Mosley was a known user, Floyd brought this up a lot in press conferences, they felt it was good information to release due to the requests. Not many people talked about the testing for May-Ortiz so the results weren't released.. Not too hard of a concept to grasp, ESPECIALLY when the facts/links are right in front of you.
|
|
|
|
#100 |
|
2011 Poster of the Year
East Side VIP
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: GA
Posts: 33,587
vCash: 524 |
yeah they should release them, but they don't have to just appease pactards. Plus I'm sure if they were dirty, NASC would know and do something about it. The fact they came out and said they were both clean is enough and if you don't think so then get a life
|
|
|
|
#101 | |
|
2011 Poster of the Year
East Side VIP
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: GA
Posts: 33,587
vCash: 524 |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#102 | |
|
Champion
East Side Guru
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 7,165
vCash: 9062 |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#104 | |
|
Champion
East Side Guru
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 9,102
vCash: 75 |
Quote:
![]() the situation is different. NSAC as of now, has never and does not act or punish anybody on the findings of a different organization. Unless USADA is in charge of this fight, their test result really doesn't mean anything. |
|
|
|
|
#105 | |
|
P4P King
East Side VIP
Join Date: May 2009
Location: In the ring with you impossible to drop
Posts: 22,011
vCash: 1000 |
Quote:
When doing something in an official capacity there is no, "there wasn't a controversy". There are standard operating procedures and you follow them. Period. If the USADA conducts testing they need to release the results or post them in a place accessible to the public. If they don't they are no more transparent and objective than any of the other agencies. The IRS requires you to file your taxes every year regardless of if you owe, don't owe, or they owe you. The DMV requires you to register cars even if they are non-operational. Protocol is protocol. Protocol must be consistent and followed regardless of the circumstance. We can't run around saying "Follow the rules!" and in the same breath say, "Well in this case we can bend the rules." As much as I hate to say it, that is not fair to Pac's camp/position. |
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|