|
|
||||||||
|
| View Poll Results: Vote... | |||
| Pedroza by decision |
|
4 | 23.53% |
| Pedroza by knockout |
|
3 | 17.65% |
| Barrera by decision |
|
9 | 52.94% |
| Barrera by knockout |
|
1 | 5.88% |
| Voters: 17. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#3 |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,692
vCash: 1000 |
IMO, placing eusebio pedroza in head to head matchups is kinda difficult. I mean he is capable of beating argeullo, nelson and sanchez, we just never saw those fights happen. I have heard from other people on this site, that it was sanchez who actually avoided pedroza and eusebio called him out.
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: City of Angels
Posts: 3,159
vCash: 1000 |
The best way to beat Barrera is by hurting him or knockout. Pedroza would not be able to Kayo Barrera, he is more of a technical boxer. Against those types of fighters Barrera comes foreward & throws without abandon. He's not afraid to take one to give one. His heavier blows would take thier toll on Pedroza. Pedroza's great stamina would make this a close fight all the way, But Barrera should take a close decision.
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Master Jabber
East Side VIP
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 11,925
vCash: 1000 |
Barerra, by close decision. I think although Pedroza was a technically very sound boxer indeed, he'd lack the raw power needed to stop MAB inside the distance.
This would likely be a closely contested fight through much of the duration, however I think Barrera pips him down the stretch of the championship rounds due to his immense workrate and stamina. Barrera SD15 Pedroza |
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 4,499
vCash: 1000 |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Champion
East Side Guru
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 7,370
vCash: 1000 |
Pedroza beats Barrera, and theres NO DOUBT in my mind about it.
Barrera is one of the more overrated "greats" of all time. While Pedroza is one of the most underrated greats of all time. |
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Good To The Last Punch
East Side Guru
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: "...The Land of Dixon and Langford..."
Posts: 6,094
vCash: 25830 |
Brooklyn was a fantastic poster. He's missed around here, that's for sure.
To answer the question, I've got Pedroza winning on points. Can trouble MAB on the outside with his height and jab and has the infighting prowess (and dirty tactics) needed to hang in there in the trenches with Barerra. Pedroza gets the UD. |
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Next Level Predictions
East Side VIP
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Team Ireland Manor, Easing Pabuiao into the life of managing the GOAT
Posts: 33,956
vCash: 1000 |
R.I.P. Brooklyn
On the fight, I could see the 'unconventional' tactics of Pedroza getting to Barrera as the fight progresses, I could also see the fight becoming a pure boxing match, where it's difficult to say who would win, at their best both men have great jabs, one is a heavy and consistent weapon, the other is a spear headed point scorer. I'm thinking that Pedrozas jab sets the pace and the tone for his elbows and roughing up, which demoralises Barrera, but the thing is that to truly demoralise Barrera and win the fight you usually need to be hurting him with your power, and I don't think that is coming ti fruition here, Barrera comes on in the second half of the fight and unloads with his heavy barrages of hooks, uppercuts and straight rights, which makes it ever so close on the cards. I lean towards Barrera. |
|
|
|
#12 |
|
ESB Junkie
East Side VIP
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 30,727
vCash: 1000 |
Who would every one say is Pedroza's best opponent? Lockridge? McGuigan? Generally Barrera has fought at a higher level.
Both have brilliant left hooks to the body, quick hands and solid fundamentals. I'm going to cop out and go with the man who looks bigger and stronger at the weight in Pedroza. MAB also didn't look like he fancied going blood and guts above 122 Did he pass away?? |
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Insanity enthusiast
ESB Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Challenging you and pushing your body to it's full limit
Posts: 1,117
vCash: 500 |
Quote:
Olivares was another notable name,and he was well past it and Pedroza looked like complete and utter shite against him.And I didn't have him winning either Lockridge fight,either(first was an outright robbery as far as I'm concerned). Pedroza was never great and I don't care how many defenses he made. EDIT: I've been ThinBlack'd |
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Champion
East Side Guru
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Auburn, WA
Posts: 6,888
vCash: 1000 |
Quote:
What? Okay, what featherweights would you put above him? Of course he was great, that's just absurd. |
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|