|
|
|
#1 |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 4,710
vCash: 500 |
1972,
A 37 year-old Floyd Patterson vs. Joe Bugner a 22 year-old up-n-comer. Would the former 2-time champion have enough skills and stamina to out-last the European new star over 12-Rounds. In 1972, Patterson still proved he was no easy walk-over, and he was in excellent shape at 190 lbs. Wins over Oscar Bonavena and Pedro Agosto in 1972, did prove that Patterson was worthy of a Top 10 Wolrd Ranking. |
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Undisputed Champion
East Side VIP
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: The Sea of Tranquility
Posts: 12,960
vCash: 1000 |
An interesting matchup..don't know why it never happened. i think Floyd would have won a decision over Joe. A late knockdown scored by Floyd would be the difference, though I'm sure that Bugner would have given him problems and would have shaken him up a few times. i just think Floyd's handspeed and ability to crack would have edged the best Bugner had.
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Champion
East Side Guru
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: South of London
Posts: 9,790
vCash: 0 |
Bugner would just be glad to be in a big fight, and as long as he went the distance he would not care about the result... Sadly he never really did.
It would not of crossed Bugner's mind, that he actually could of won the fight if fully focused. |
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 1,726
vCash: 1000 |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 4,710
vCash: 500 |
Good calls so far,
In 1972, Floyd was still regarded as a Top 5 fighter by Ring Magazine. As for Jozsef Bugner, he had just cracked the Top 10. Joe's height would have presented a bit of a problem for Floyd, but he was effective in modifying his style to overcome some obstacles. I think Floyd's superior skills would have been enough for him to earn a 12-Round decision over Bugner, who was still having problems with his non-aggressive style. Last edited by Senor Pepe'; 04-02-2012 at 01:56 PM. |
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Historian/Film Maker
East Side Guru
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 6,516
vCash: 1000 |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Journeyman
ESB Jr Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 286
vCash: 500 |
The previous year, Joe Bugner barely won a very unpopular decision against Henry Cooper. In 1972 I believe Floyd Patterson had enough left to win a comfortable decision over Bugner.
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Contender
ESB Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 769
vCash: 1000 |
Obviously I'm a big Floyd fan, my childhood hero. There was no reason they would have fought in 72; the one poster said "why did this not happen?" Easy, Floyd was on the downside of his career and wanted nothing more than a rematch with Ali. To do that, he had to score a win over a top contender (Oscar).
To be honest, a 72 Bugner may have jabbed and hugged his way to a decision over a 37 yr. old Floyd but, as fighters, only one merits HOF consideration. |
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|