|
|
|
#1 |
|
Contender
ESB Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,229
vCash: 1000 |
With all these threads about how poor gallagher is as a trainer making all these plodders, i ask how would you best define the manchester style?
IMO its basically similar to the mexican style ala barrera and margarito. a very aggressive style, which heavily emphasizes body punches. the best we've had is ricky hatton who blocks, slips and rolls punches better than given credit for as he lost to two of the best fighters in this era. |
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
He physically glassed him
East Side Guru
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 7,056
vCash: 500 |
They are deluding themselves with this Manchester Mexican phrase.
It's basically a load of pub fighters trying to copy what they see top Mexicans do on tv. Exept with none of the class, talent or chins to do so. Then they take hellacious beatings from good boxers |
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Mandanda Running E-Pen
East Side VIP
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 13,044
vCash: 500 |
Funny thing is Mexican's accept they aren't the most defensively aware nation for boxing but they must stand there in awe of the sheer stupidity of this 'Manchester style'. Look at the aggressive Mexican's and they all had method the there madness and skills. Footwork of Morales should be on tomorrow's agenda at the gym.
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Rumplestiltskin
East Side VIP
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: South Korea via Manchester
Posts: 40,852
vCash: 1667 |
It is not a Manchester style. Like TFFP said Brodie was not like that. Nor was Hatton or going further back Barrett or Thompson.
It is a Gallagher style. |
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|