|
|
|
#2 |
|
Nash Equilibrium Debunker
East Side VIP
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Boston
Posts: 96,233
vCash: 75 |
Of course it would be bigger.
I don't know what the betting line was offhand, but surely Tito wasn't THAT big an underdog? Plus, that win was controversial. So unless Cotto wins by close decision because Mayweather got on his bike late and "gave it away", then yes this would absolutely be bigger without any doubt. Cotto isn't supposed to win, plain and simple. |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Future Hall Of Famer
East Side VIP
Join Date: May 2012
Location: LA/Canada
Posts: 17,563
vCash: 816 |
Agreed. Just wondering though because it seems that Cotto isn't as revered as Tito was by Puerto Ricans (from my view, anyways)
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Diamond Dog
East Side VIP
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 34,759
vCash: 1000 |
Be a huge upset. Douglasesque.
It would be interesting to see something like that in fact, a fight Money appears to win on the cards but where Cotto gets the nod. I wonder what the reaction would be like? |
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,483
vCash: 75 |
If you actually believe that Tito beat De La Hoya, you certainly are starting off on the wrong foot trying to learn and/or discuss boxing.
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,856
vCash: 75 |
Quote:
This is not about who won, but about the difference in impact should the upset happen. Stop being so bitter, we all know Oscar is only "Mexican" when it comes to the Tito fight.
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,483
vCash: 75 |
Quote:
thread. As you were gents.... |
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|