At This Point How Can You Justify 50-50 for Floyd Vs Pac

[puga_ni_nana]

Originally Posted by Diamond Eye

Why do fans give a **** about their finances again?

Just fight. All that shit can be handled behind closed doors. It's none of my damn business.

well flomos are trying hard to defend floyd's ducking out the 50/50 split when it was offered to him.

just half the purse and fight. we won't get a single cent out of it.

[TheGreat]

Originally Posted by Beatle

Floyd fought Shane, Hatton and Oscar when they had just won world titles and were considered the best in their divisions. Pacman fought these guys AFTER Floyd had beaten them, and they were no longer considered P4P in the top ten.

So the people who went to see Floyd vs Oscar went to see two great fighters at the top of their game. Those who went to see Pacman vs Oscar went to see only one fighter in his prime vs a shot Oscar.

So delete Oscar, Shane and Hatton.

Cotto: Floyd > Pac
JMM: Pac > Floyd

Here, both Cotto and Marquez were in their primes and so it makes sense to compare the numbers.

One each. That means 50-50.

By your own words, you just said Floyd has been fighting better comp, therefore he should get the bigger share of the money

[Diamond Eye]

I think it's a duck.

I mean, it's a lot of damn money. The two biggest stars in boxing are Mayweather and Pacquaio.

What the hell is the problem?

Mayweather will make more money than Pacquaio regardless...

I just want to see the fight. I'm tired of all this talking...

It ain't gonna happen though. PERIOD. Besides, Mayweather said he's contemplating retirement. I think this is a lost cause at this point.