|
|
|
#1 |
|
Gatekeeper
ESB Full Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 447
vCash: 217 |
With Haye having the same height, style, power and weight as young Foreman just how do we think this fight would go down seeing Ali vs "The Hayemaker" during the exact same moment in history.
http://www.saddoboxing.com/boxing_images2/Haye.jpg http://www.thesweetscience.com/image...-foreman-7.jpg With Haye being equal to all of Foreman's attributes then we also have to look at the advantages that has over Foreman. Footwork. The characteristic footwork employed by most of the world's major boxing has changed little over the centuries, and has remained largely invariable between radically different cultures. The boxer relies on 'push stepping'. In which the leading leg advances first, then the rear, with the feet coming to rest in the exact relative position. Rear movement is a reversal of this step, and lateral movement involves push stepping in the same fashion, with the foot closest to the desired direction stepping laterally, followed by the opposite foot, which is used to move the body. For the pugilist, footwork is to be deft and simplistic, allowing the fighter to move in and out of striking range as quickly as possible. Footwork is key to generating sufficient power in the basic strikes shared between the major styles. During the jab, the lead foot can move forward to close distance or remain stationary. During the cross, the rear foot pivots inward to launch the rear shoulder forward, allowing the cross a good deal of its strength. During the left hook, the lead foot pivots in an inward manner to transfer bodyweight. The right hook's pivot is identical to the cross (assuming the boxer is orthodox). The lead uppercut, like the jab does not use any pivotal motion, the power comes from the transfer of bodyweight to the lead foot. The rear uppercut employs the same inward pivot as the cross. To maintain balance, both feet can step, pivot or slide as appropriate. The jab may be thrown while moving forward or backward; for the other punches it is advisable not to throw while in motion. Head movement. [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6W_nAcQKR5I"]You Tube[/ame] All in all I think Haye will be able to push ali to the limits but in the end lose this one on points. |
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: London
Posts: 3,105
vCash: 1000 |
A 1974 Ali would embarrass him. If Haye had the title, Ali would show no mercy. He'd thrash him. Probably KO or TKO around 7th round. For fuck's sake, in 1974 Joe Bugner would probably easily outbox Haye. Haye would be lucky to crack the top 10. |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
ᴻᴼ ᴸᴼᴻᴳᴲᴿ ᴲ۷ᴵᴸ
East Side VIP
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: A hollow vulcano lair!
Posts: 19,864
vCash: 4000 |
He will run and lose the widest decision possible, collect his check and blame some injury/bad trainingcamp or whatever for his embarrasing loss.
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Detroit, I shall return.
East Side Guru
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: That gum you like is going to come back in style
Posts: 7,482
vCash: 4289 |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Contender
ESB Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 973
vCash: 500 |
Ali would most likely win a UD or a late TKO, it depends if Haye throws alot or not, fighters taller than him he tends to throw little, but fighters smaller or the same height he throws a far greater amount.
Out of 10 fights Ali wins 8 to 2. |
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Undisputed Champion
East Side VIP
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 12,933
vCash: 1900 |
With a best Heavyweight win of an old John Ruiz I can definitely see why you see his attributes as similar to Foreman.
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Gatekeeper
ESB Full Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 447
vCash: 217 |
Klitschko and Valuev are two of the biggest ever punchers in the sport and they didn't even manage to wobble the Hayemaker. Enzo was also a tasty puncher at CW when Hayemaker finished him. Haye's only been down a couple of times and they were due to stamina issues. |
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|